Montreal, Canada
June 16, 2002
June 16, 2002
June 19, 2002
2153-5965
7
7.982.1 - 7.982.7
10.18260/1-2--10165
https://peer.asee.org/10165
415
Main Menu Session 1380
Resource for Effective Engineering Physics Laboratory and Project Assignments
James M. Hereford
Department of Physics and Engineering Murray State University Murray, KY 42071
Abstract: Though effective project and laboratory assignments are important in an engineering education, the development of good assignments is impeded by several factors: (i) the present academic reward system does not encourage or promote laboratory development time; (ii) there is no mechanism in place to distribute labs; (iii) there is no mechanism in place to review or recognize appropriate lab assignments. In this paper, we present a resource that addresses the distribution of effective lab assignments. It is a web page that contains lab and project assignments appropriate to an Engineering Physics curriculum as well as links to other resources. We also present a proposal for a national database of lab assignments. This resource will, hopefully, encourage cooperation among universities, provide 3 rd party recognition for assignment authors, shorten preparation time for professors at other universities, and lead to more effective assignments for the students.
1. Introduction
Effective laboratory and project assignments are an important element in engineering education. Good laboratory assignments can spark interest in the students, correct conceptual misunderstandings, and help students adjust quicker to the work environment. (If a student has already used specific hardware and software tools in a university lab, then he/she will not need to be trained to use them on the job.)
However, rarely is there incentive or reward for professors to invest time in the development of effective lab assignments. Some of the hindrances to developing good assignments are: (i) it is time-consuming to develop lab and project assignments. There is the planning of the assignment itself and communicating what is expected to the student; often each step must also be clearly stated and described – almost in a tutorial fashion. (ii) One must fit the labs to the available equipment. For example, in a circuits lab, there is the issue of equipment (oscilloscope, waveform generator, power supply, multimeter, breadboad), the specifications and capabilities of each piece of equipment (e.g., bandwidth of scope, digital storage capability, print capability), availability of individual components (resistors, capacitors, inductors, transistors, etc) and number of test stations. (iii) There is no (or only small) tangible reward for development of good labs. Developing good labs takes time and creativity but it does not carry the same weight in
Proceedings of the 2002 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Copyright © 2002, American Society of Engineering Education
Main Menu
Hereford, J. (2002, June), Resource For Effective Engineering Physics Laboratory And Project Assignments Paper presented at 2002 Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada. 10.18260/1-2--10165
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2002 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015