Asee peer logo

Returning and Direct Pathway Students: How the Decision-Making Process of Engineering Master’s Degree Pursuit Is Influenced by Industry Experience

Download Paper |

Conference

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Baltimore , Maryland

Publication Date

June 25, 2023

Start Date

June 25, 2023

End Date

June 28, 2023

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 5: Graduate Student Experience and Decision-Making

Tagged Division

Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

Page Count

20

DOI

10.18260/1-2--44134

Permanent URL

https://strategy.asee.org/44134

Download Count

103

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Alayna Grace Wanless

biography

Diane L. Peters Kettering University Orcid 16x16 orcid.org/0000-0001-8177-8145

visit author page

Dr. Peters is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kettering University.

visit author page

biography

Elizabeth Gross Sam Houston State University Orcid 16x16 orcid.org/0000-0002-1648-7090

visit author page

Elizabeth A. Gross MLIS, PhD is currently assistant professor of Library Science and Technology at Sam Houston State University and engineering education researcher. She achieved her doctoral degree in learning design and technology from Wayne State Unive

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

Understanding the decision-making process when students are considering graduate school in engineering is important to institutions and to individual faculty who advise students, and has therefore been a subject of interest for many researchers. This process, and the factors which impact students’ decisions, depends on the background and individual circumstances of the student in question. Recently, research has also been conducted regarding returners in graduate engineering programs: those who return to attend graduate school after five years or more of working in industry. This paper aims to bridge the gap between these two genres of research and study the differences in the decision making process between returner and direct pathway students, specifically in master’s degree programs in engineering. In this study, both returners and direct-pathway students, those who had less than five years’ gap between completing their bachelor’s degree and starting a master’s degree, were surveyed as part of a larger research study on returners. This survey was administered in a web-based format, and distributed to multiple universities throughout the United States, with the participants all being U.S. citizens or permanent residents. Questions regarding the decision to attend graduate school were isolated and examined using standard statistical methods. From these statistical tests, we were able to obtain results which include:

- Returners are significantly less likely to use an undergraduate professor for a letter of recommendation for a masters program and more likely to use a recommendation from a colleague - Project portfolios were mentioned by multiple returners as supplemental material submitted with their graduate school applications - The source of information used the highest amount by both groups in the decision making process for selecting a grad school was the university website. However, returners used websites to a significantly higher degree - The desire to advance in their career was the highest motivating factor for returners to attend graduate school

These conclusions help us understand how priorities differ between these two student groups and may aid universities in their recruitment of graduate students from both backgrounds.

Wanless, A. G., & Peters, D. L., & Gross, E. (2023, June), Returning and Direct Pathway Students: How the Decision-Making Process of Engineering Master’s Degree Pursuit Is Influenced by Industry Experience Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--44134

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2023 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015