Asee peer logo

Roadblocks In The Six Sigma Process

Download Paper |

Conference

2003 Annual Conference

Location

Nashville, Tennessee

Publication Date

June 22, 2003

Start Date

June 22, 2003

End Date

June 25, 2003

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

EM Skills and Concepts in the Real World

Page Count

5

Page Numbers

8.993.1 - 8.993.5

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/12027

Download Count

67

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Neslihan Alp

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Session 2003-2140

Roadblocks in the Six-Sigma Process Neslihan Alp, Ph.D. and Mike Yaworsky University of Tennessee at Chattanooga

Abstract

Six-Sigma is a quality improvement program used by many major companies with varying degrees of success. This paper shows the Process Map for the Six-Sigma Process and identifies the most difficult steps. A survey is conducted to collect data from several companies to develop the Six- Sigma Process Map and determine the most critical steps. The results show that the following steps are the most difficult steps throughout the whole process:

q Develop project ideas

q Verify benefits

q Update database

q Receive Certification

I. Introduction

The Six Sigma Methodology was developed at Motorola during the mid-1980’s as a new approach to Quality Assurance. While quality programs like TQM (Total Quality Management) or Kaizen a continuous improvement methodology were using similar tools (i.e. Capability Studies, Pareto Analysis, Designed Experiments) to improve quality, many companies found that they did not succeed. Where Six Sigma differs substantially from other programs is [1]: q In-depth training in statistical analysis over a three-month period in conjunction with a training project for each student. q Easy “point and click” software (Minitab) for statistical analysis available for the first time, and thorough training in how to use it. q A measurement system that relates quality improvements to the language of management- that is, all results are tracked in terms of a Quality Capability Score and dollars saved by reducing the Cost of Failure. q A program with specific quality-improvement projects identified and planned for specific implementation dates.

Alp, N. (2003, June), Roadblocks In The Six Sigma Process Paper presented at 2003 Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee. https://peer.asee.org/12027

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2003 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015