June 12, 2005
June 12, 2005
June 15, 2005
10.1093.1 - 10.1093.17
Role of Axiomatic Design in Teaching Capstone Courses Edwin Odom, Steven Beyerlein, Christopher A. Brown, Daniel Drew, Lloyd Gallup, Sam Zimmerman, and Jeremy Olberding
University of Idaho/Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Helping undergraduate engineering students learn effective design practices that are applicable to the modern workplace is one of the most complex challenges of engineering education. One strategy to help students master open-ended design projects is to use a systematic process. However, students often want to jump past the front end of the design process and this compromises the quality of the final product. This paper examines the suitability of Axiomatic Design in addressing this problem. Central to Axiomatic Design is early identification of uncoupled design parameters that address independent functional requirements. A new design process, incorporating Axiomatic Design methods along with the use of Acclaro software (http://www.axiomaticdesign.com) was developed in this work and piloted with several capstone design teams at the University of Idaho during the current academic year. Early indications are that these teams were more successful in establishing functional requirements that were more complete, more logically hierarchical, and more independent than other design teams. Furthermore, design ideas discussed by these teams seemed to be accepted or rejected on their own technical merits, rather than the force of the personalities of students who presented them. Thus, we have concluded that axiomatic design helps capstone teams produce higher quality design projects.
This paper explores benefits and issues associated with incorporating Axiomatic Design into a capstone design experience. Specifically, we wanted to determine if Axiomatic Design could alleviate difficulties encountered when using a traditional algorithmic approach to design. We focused on the problem definition, solidification of the conceptual design, and the completion of CAD drawings that identify design parameters that satisfy functional requirements.
In the traditional algorithmic approach, which has been used with over one hundred capstone design projects at the University of Idaho, about half the projects suffer from the need to rectify unforeseen problems that necessitate substantial iteration and additional expenditures late in the design process. This approach involves problem definition with a list of “musts” and “shoulds,” idea generation, and concept selection. The approach is algorithmic in that a sequence of activities is prescribed, and the implication is that a good design process results in a good design product. In this process, there are no generally applicable rules to assess the success of the design, other that how well the design complies with the list of “musts” and “shoulds.”
Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education
Beyerlein, S. (2005, June), Role For Axiomatic Design In Teaching Capstone Courses Paper presented at 2005 Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2--14684
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2005 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015