Nashville, Tennessee
June 22, 2003
June 22, 2003
June 25, 2003
2153-5965
9
8.996.1 - 8.996.9
10.18260/1-2--12550
https://peer.asee.org/12550
1712
Session 3613
Rubric Development for Assessment of Undergraduate Research: Evaluating Multidisciplinary Team Projects
Kevin D. Dahm, James A. Newell and Heidi L. Newell Department of Chemical Engineering Rowan University Glassboro, NJ 08028
Abstract
At Rowan University, all engineering students participate in clinic courses involving multidisciplinary student teams working on semester-long or year-long research projects led by an engineering professor. The difficulty arises in trying to assess student learning and performance in project-based team settings. Faced with the complexity of trying to assess the attainment of learning outcomes for each individual on a team based on an unclear blend of technical merit, communication, project planning, data analysis, and teaming behaviors, faculty members and students both fall short. It is unreasonable to expect students to achieve specific learning objectives from a series of courses, when the faculty members themselves are unclear about what the learning objectives are and how to measure them
As a first effort to address the assessment of team performance in project-based research experiences, the faculty of the Chemical Engineering Department, as a pilot study, developed four primary areas of importance for assessment. Once these areas were selected, specific indicators were developed for each, so that the students would have clearly defined goals and behaviors that reflect the desired learning outcomes. Faculty assessment of these rubrics indicate that they are very effective in demystifying the evaluation process and serve to better connect the grade in the course to the stated learning objectives.
Introduction
Experts agree on the importance of involving undergraduates in research-based learning [1-3] and teamwork [4-6]. The Boyer Commission suggested that research-based learning should become the standard for undergraduate education [7]. Many universities are responding to this challenge by introducing multidisciplinary laboratory or design courses [8,9]. At Rowan University, we have developed a method of addressing these diverse challenges, while also implementing valuable
Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education
Newell, J., & Dahm, K. (2003, June), Rubric Development For Assessment Of Multidisciplinary Team Projects Paper presented at 2003 Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee. 10.18260/1-2--12550
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2003 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015