June 22, 2008
June 22, 2008
June 25, 2008
Design in Engineering Education
13.1062.1 - 13.1062.9
1. Jonassen, D.H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology: Research & Development, 48 (4), 63-85. 2. Meacham, J.A., Emont, N.C. (1989). The interpersonal basis of everyday problem solving. In J.D. Sinnott (Ed.), Everyday problem solving: Theory and applications (pp. 7-23). New York: Praeger. 3. Mostow, J. (1985). Toward better models of the design process. AI Magazine, 6, 44-57 4. Dym, C.L., & Little, P. (2004). Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction 5. Darses, F. The constraint satisfaction approach to design: A psychological investigation. Acta Psychologica, 78, 307-325 (1991). 6. Chi, M.T.H., Slotta, J.D., & de Leeuw, N/A. From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4: 27-43 (1994). 7. Cho, K.L., & Jonassen, D.H. (2002). The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving. Educational Technology: Research & Development, 50 (3)5-22.
Jonassen, D., & Knott, T., & Goff, R. (2008, June), Scaffolding Collaborative Design Online Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 10.18260/1-2--3459
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2008 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015