Asee peer logo

Scholarship Reconsidered And Its Impact On Engineering And Technology Graduate Education

Download Paper |

Conference

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Publication Date

June 22, 2008

Start Date

June 22, 2008

End Date

June 25, 2008

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Measuring Success of Graduate Program Components

Tagged Division

Graduate Studies

Page Count

10

Page Numbers

13.1065.1 - 13.1065.10

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/3364

Download Count

42

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

James Zhang Western Carolina University

author page

Ken Burbank Western Carolina University

author page

Brian Howell Western Carolina University

author page

Bill Yang Western Carolina University

author page

Yeqin Huang Western Carolina University

author page

Robert Adams Western Carolina University

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Scholarship Reconsidered and Its Impact on Engineering and Technology Graduate Education

Abstract:

Boyer’s model of scholarship classifies scholarships into discovery, integration, application, and teaching. Since its inception in 1990, this model has impacted university faculty’s perception of scholarship as well as Tenure, Promotion, and Reappointment (TPR) policies of many universities.

This paper discusses the impact of Boyer’s model on engineering and technology graduate education. The “GREAT” model, standing for Graduate Research, Engagement, Applications, and Teaching, is proposed. Implementation processes and results of this model in the Master of Science in Technology (MST) program at Western Carolina University are reported, and implications of further research on the impact of engineering and technology graduate education are discussed.

Introduction

In his book “Scholarship Reconsidered,” Boyer argued that scholarships should be expanded beyond pure research. He classified scholarships into four categories: discovery, integration, application, and teaching 1. This is the well-known “Boyer’s model of scholarship.” Since its inception in 1990, Boyer’s model has been widely discussed and debated, and the focus has mainly been on its impact on university faculty, especially their tenure, promotion, and reappointment (TPR) policies 2, 3.

However, scholarships are not generated by faculty alone. Our students, especially graduate students, are an important integral part of the scholarship. They serve as a backbone of pure research (discovery), a vehicle of implementations (integration and application), and a bridge between faculty and the students, graduate and undergraduates alike (teaching). Their efforts of generating and improving the quality of scholarships can never be undermined, and adoption of Boyer’s model definitely sets a new direction of graduate education in terms of scholarships.

Zhang, J., & Burbank, K., & Howell, B., & Yang, B., & Huang, Y., & Adams, R. (2008, June), Scholarship Reconsidered And Its Impact On Engineering And Technology Graduate Education Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. https://peer.asee.org/3364

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2008 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015