Asee peer logo

Selection Criteria For Design Build Projects For Private Owners

Download Paper |

Conference

2003 Annual Conference

Location

Nashville, Tennessee

Publication Date

June 22, 2003

Start Date

June 22, 2003

End Date

June 25, 2003

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Advances I

Page Count

9

Page Numbers

8.1003.1 - 8.1003.9

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/11497

Download Count

234

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Khalid Siddiqi

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Session No. 1121 Paper No. 2003-1203

Private Owner Selection Criteria for Design-Build Projects

Pouria Mohammadian, and Khalid Siddiqi

Construction Program, Southern Polytechnic State University, Marietta Georgia 30060

Abstract

Private owners, in search of a more efficient method of project delivery, are increasingly turning to design-build option for project delivery. A tremendous growth in number of design-build projects and very few literature articles on private sector rationale for choosing design-build delivery necessitate more studies in this particular area. This paper analyzes and prioritizes design-build selection factors from a private owner perspective. The factors considered in the study include single point responsibility, reducing cost, shortening duration, reducing claims, large project size, complexity, Constructability, and innovation. A questionnaire was administered, followed by actual interviews with private owners to validate findings from the study. Results from the study demonstrate the relative importance of factors considered by the private sector while choosing design-build for project delivery. This paper is beneficial for private sector owners, architect, engineers, and contractors who either are experienced or plan on doing Design-Build projects in future.

Introduction

Design-Build is by far the fastest growing method of project delivery in the United States [2, 7] (Rizzo 1996, Friedlander 1999). The total number of Design-Build contracts, according to the statistics complied by the Design-Build Institute of America is increasing by more than One hundred percent (100%) annually [2] (Rizzo 1996). Design-Build construction represents Fifty percent (50%) of construction in Europe and Seventy percent (70%) in Japan [3] (Molennar 1999). Use of Design-Build in private sector is growing at the rate of Eighty percent to One hundred fifty percent (80-150%), depending on the category of construction. An inevitable outcome of this growth is the increased number of contractors and architect- engineers entering in Design-Build projects. Additionaly, such growth suggests an increase in the number of owners who are likely to go for Design-Build delivery for the first time. Continued success of the Design-Build projects requires documentation and dissemination of fundamental Design-Build knowledge to the new entrants. Better understanding of Design-Build delivery mechanism is critical for owners who plan to undertake new projects. Selection factors based on experience of owners from previous projects, delivered through Design-Build, could provide necessary understanding to the new owners.

Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright? 2003, American Society for Engineering Education.

Siddiqi, K. (2003, June), Selection Criteria For Design Build Projects For Private Owners Paper presented at 2003 Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee. https://peer.asee.org/11497

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2003 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015