Asee peer logo

Self Aligning Mechanisms – Forgotten Part Of The Me Curriculum.

Download Paper |

Conference

2000 Annual Conference

Location

St. Louis, Missouri

Publication Date

June 18, 2000

Start Date

June 18, 2000

End Date

June 21, 2000

ISSN

2153-5965

Page Count

14

Page Numbers

5.540.1 - 5.540.14

DOI

10.18260/1-2--8689

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/8689

Download Count

3093

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Wieslaw M. Szydlowski

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Session 3425

Self-Aligning Mechanisms, Forgotten Part of ME Curriculum

Wieslaw M. Szydlowski

University of Nebraska-Lincoln Mechanical Engineering Department

Abstract

Mechanical engineering students designing machinery are confronted with the lack of a reliable method in determining if the machinery will move after assembly, and under what conditions assembly is possible at all. Gruebler’ and Chebyshev’s formulas found in the majority of American textbooks are unreliable. A simple, though almost unknown, loop analysis developed by Ozol can solve the problem. The loop analysis allows one not only to check if the mechanism can move, but also provides a valuable insight into the design of self-aligning mechanisms insensitive to manufacturing and assembly errors.

Introduction

One of the most important tasks in designing a mechanism is checking if the proposed device constitutes a mechanism and not a rigid structure. In the language of mechanical engineers, the procedure is called checking the mobility of the mechanism. The mobility of the mechanism is defined as the number of degrees of freedom that the mechanism possesses with respect to one arbitrarily chosen link. One can determine the mobility of the mechanism by “fixing” links one by one, until the mechanism is not able to move. The number of fixed links that immobilizes whole mechanism is equal to its mobility. The Gruebler’s and Kutzbach’s formulas for the mobility of a plane mechanism and found in majority of textbooks on kinematics, [1], [2], [3], although they are known to produce misleading results.

The second task of the designer is to formulate geometric conditions (parallel axes, tight tolerances on some dimensions, etc.) to make assembly possible. The geometric conditions imposed in this stage on the links of the mechanism are also known as the redundant constraints. An example of a system with redundant constraints is a four-leg table placed on a warped floor. To avoid shaking of the table one of its legs must have a strictly defined length.

Unfortunately, parts are machined with errors. If errors are too large, the assembly may not be possible, or would require force to connect its parts together. Reshetov [4], gives examples of when bad geometry of links caused internal loads on the parts that exceeded many times the loads for which the machine was designed. To visualize the problem, compare two sets of links for two four-bar linkages shown in Fig 1. The set shown on the left can be easily assembled

Szydlowski, W. M. (2000, June), Self Aligning Mechanisms – Forgotten Part Of The Me Curriculum. Paper presented at 2000 Annual Conference, St. Louis, Missouri. 10.18260/1-2--8689

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2000 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015