Asee peer logo

Senior Design Projects For Engineering Technology: Issues, Benefits, And Trade Offs

Download Paper |

Conference

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Austin, Texas

Publication Date

June 14, 2009

Start Date

June 14, 2009

End Date

June 17, 2009

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Capstone and Senior Design in Engineering Technology

Tagged Division

Engineering Technology

Page Count

9

Page Numbers

14.1051.1 - 14.1051.9

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/4511

Download Count

57

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Ivana Milanovic University of Hartford

visit author page

Ivana Milanovic is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering in the College of Engineering, Technology, and Architecture at the University of Hartford. She received her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Polytechnic Institute of NYU, NY and M.S. and B.S. from University of Belgrade, Serbia.

visit author page

biography

Tom Eppes University of Hartford

visit author page

Tom Eppes is an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering in the College of Engineering, Technology, and Architecture at the University of Hartford. He holds Bachelor and Master of Science degrees in Electrical Engineering from Texas A&M University and a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Michigan.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Capstone Projects for Engineering Technology: Issues, Benefits and Trade-offs Abstract

Capstone courses in our engineering technology (ET) programs are structured as open-ended undertakings where students are expected to creatively analyze, synthesize, and apply a wide- variety of learning outcomes from prior coursework. A capstone project may either be industry- sponsored or internally-sourced with student teams advised by faculty and engineers from local companies. The team’s goal is to meet the deliverables required by the proposal or statement of work. The semester culminates with a formal presentation of results evaluated by a professional panel of practitioners and a final report substantiating the results and findings.

Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) seniors are tasked to solve multi-disciplinary problems based on a statement of work initiated by a sponsoring local company. Electronic Engineering Technology (EET) projects originate internally in the form of proposals developed jointly by students and faculty with the objective being to design, construct and test a prototype system.

A quality project requires faculty, sponsors and students to weigh a number of issues. Those that have no practical value or that merely serve the short term needs of an industry sponsor are not suitable. Another challenge is setting the scope of work and level of difficulty to be appropriate for ET seniors. Successful project management among the team members and their relationship to the faculty and external sponsors requires an array of communication and soft skills. Resources must be factored into the planning process: e.g. fabrication capabilities, technical support and/or the cost of purchased components/services. In small teaching institutions, the above issues are especially critical and must be carefully weighed.

This paper discusses the structure, approach and evolution of capstone projects within our College. It compares and contrasts the differences between industry-sponsored and internally- sourced projects. The elements of project structure, resource trade-offs and successful execution are addressed as well as the issues and benefits experienced by students, faculty and industry sponsors.

Introduction

Capstone project courses are a vital element in engineering technology (ET) programs. Since capstone courses are integrating experiences and appear prominently in assessment plans, successful programs are highly dependent on the resulting performance of students. Efforts to improve capstone quality have been the subject of much work in recent years. The primary motivations behind capstone improvements are: increasing industry relevance, showcasing graduate skills and the desire of faculty to adopt new best practices. However, it has been observed that too often students lack the necessary creativity, initiative and ability to develop robust solutions. Some have addressed this issue by developing innovative laboratory structures throughout the curriculum that better prepare seniors for the challenge1. Others have sought to connect students with local industry either prior to or during the capstone project2-8.

Milanovic, I., & Eppes, T. (2009, June), Senior Design Projects For Engineering Technology: Issues, Benefits, And Trade Offs Paper presented at 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/4511

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2009 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015