Salt Lake City, Utah
June 23, 2018
June 23, 2018
July 27, 2018
Educational Research and Methods
This research paper explores the experiences of low socioeconomic (SES) students and identifies the unequal opportunities they may have experiencing STEM. Though STEM literature continues to encourage research surrounding minority identities, very few studies solely examine students who classify as low SES. Some intersectional research examines SES alongside or within race or first-generation status, but this focus may not provide an understanding of how SES, specifically, may factor into students’ STEM experiences and career goals. Many studies focus on deficit models of low SES students who lack college preparation or access to particular STEM experiences.
As part of a larger project, 15,847 undergraduate students at 37 institutions were surveyed regarding their STEM attitudes, interests, and pre-college STEM experiences. Students also provided their home ZIP codes in high school. Of the students who completed the survey, 2,372 identified themselves as engineering students and provided a ZIP code. We matched 2010 U.S. Census data for median household income to students’ responses via provided ZIP codes, and defined groups of low (n = 191), middle (n = 342), or high (n = 1,839) neighborhood SES based on the terciles within the sample. Pearson’s Chi-Squared Test and ANOVA/Kruskal-Wallis Tests, α set at the 0.05 level, were used to understand whether neighborhood SES was a significant factor in students’ career aspirations, their opportunities to participate in STEM activities, and perceptions of their school and home communities.
Low SES students had higher expectations than their peers to develop knowledge, use their talents, and be independent in their future jobs. Additionally, low SES students were more likely to participate in programs about higher education and career choices. In contrast, high SES peers had higher expectations to have a secure job, work with people, and have personal time in their future jobs. We also found that, not surprisingly, high SES peers had more experiences with mathematics (including higher levels of mathematics in high school), and more frequent AP test taking. These high SES students were more likely to have a father in a STEM job and to have family encourage them to pursue STEM, maybe leading to their consideration of engineering; low SES students reported that no person encouraged them to study STEM. Lastly, we found that higher SES peers more often felt like they made a difference in their school community or outside of school. Additionally, they reported feeling a sense of community, that members of the community supported them, and that they had strong community networks.
Our results speak to the disproportionately few opportunities low SES students have to experience STEM, and also to the assets and motivation that low SES students bring into STEM. Additionally, the smaller numbers within our low SES group speak to the underrepresentation of low SES students in engineering. This result highlights the need for the engineering education community to engage in studies which seek to understand the individual experiences of low SES students and the development of their attitudes and beliefs towards STEM.
Major, J. C., & Godwin, A., & Sonnert, G. (2018, June), STEM Experiences of Engineering Students From Low-Socioeconomic Neighborhoods Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. https://peer.asee.org/30990
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2018 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015