June 15, 2019
June 15, 2019
October 19, 2019
A teaching collaboration project between a Senior Design course instructor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) and a doctoral candidate in the College of Education to develop writing activities to improve the writing of executive summaries. Conducting a genre analysis of civil engineering executive summaries has led to better student writing pleasing the CEE Department’s advisory board members who assessed these executive summaries at the end of each semester over a two year period two with incremental interventions.
The intervention began with identifying what should be in an engineering executive summary and defining executive summaries. Resulting in limited descriptions in technical communication textbooks within the context of civil engineering as opposed to executive summary writing for general business purposes (Markel, 2016). Classroom activities for the students included an editing exercise of sentences from student writing, instruction on the purpose of and the typical audience of the executive summary emphasizing the primary audience is not necessarily a fellow engineer. After the students wrote an executive summary for their project they were grouped with students of different expertise to peer-edit the summaries. These activities helped students become aware of jargon used for the details of the project and identify big picture perspectives, which were often left out by the student engineers such as location, purpose and broader context of the project, cost and time to completion. The first semester of the intervention there was praise from the advisory board on the improved writing of the students. This presentation will identify the key genre moves required to write a successful executive summary.
Following the design from Winsor (1996) as she identified what engineering students learn about writing in their course work and internships, and Parkinson, McKay & Demechleer (2017) identifying in how they identified how trainee carpenters adjusted to workplace language during the trainees’ transition to the workplace, this particular study compared executive summaries via genre analysis following Biber, Connor and Upton’s (2007) bottom up approach to discourse analysis. Their seven step approach is followed to identify the features students were having difficulty achieving. The summaries from the two semesters prior to the intervention were compared to the executive summaries written after the first and second semester’s interventions. Additionally, the advisory board’s feedback has helped identify elements of what exactly should be in an executive summary. Dovetailing technical writing theory and analysis and feedback from professional practicing engineers, the requirements of this occluded genre have been identified. This helps students write executive summaries for final projects in such a manner as will benefit them for their future engineering careers.
Morton, C. N., & Roo, A. K. (2019, June), Strategies to Improve Engineers’ Writing of Executive Summaries Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--31916
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2019 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015