San Antonio, Texas
June 10, 2012
June 10, 2012
June 13, 2012
25.1180.1 - 25.1180.18
StrengthsQuest for EngineersThis research was precipitated by a leadership course presented by the Chair Academy, a U.S.based leadership organization, which introduced Gallup’s online strengths assessment toolStrengthsQuest as a valuable instrument in the development of educational leadership. TheGallup organization has a considerable body of literature on strengths and the use of strengths asa mechanism for enhancing self understanding and improving team performance. It was clearfrom the outset of the course that this tool might be useful as an educational tool (for thestudents) and as a research tool (engineering educational research) in analyzing the first yearengineering educational experience. As a result, the StrengthsQuest tool was introduced in ourfirst year program as a part of the curriculum in a course entitled “The Orientation to theEngineering Profession”. This initiative has become an ongoing longitudinal study examining thestrengths of first year engineering students, to determine whether or not each engineering grouppossesses a unique strengths signature. Can this information be used to improve the educationalexperience of the students by teaching to their strengths? The results presented in this study spana three year period. Results for two similarly sized student groups are considered.This article highlights the process that was required to use the StrengthsQuest tool, both as a partof the curriculum and as a research tool to study the “strengths” of first year engineering students(~200 students). Results are also presented showing the engineering students’ strengths in termsof academic achievement. The results were analyzed in light of strengths based research. Thearticle presents a preliminary literature survey which establishes a link between Gallup’s strengthbased research and the body of literature on personality assessments of engineering students. Inparticular, there seems to be a strong connection between the thirty four Gallup strengths, and thesixteen Myers Briggs personality types.The results that have been obtained to date are interesting, since there appears to be a “strengths”signature or a dominant set of strengths for the engineering student groups considered in thisstudy. The same type of pheonomenon was observed in the literature when personality typeassessments were conducted with engineering students. In particular, a common signature forengineering students using Myers-Briggs typing was “(E/I)STJ. In this study, for both groups,the dominant strength “competition” appeared in the top five strengths of 40% of each of the twogroups. Furthermore, seven key strengths were common in the top ten strengths of both groups:“achiever”, “adaptability”, “analytical”, “competition”, “futuristic”, “learner” and “restorative” .The research project also generated a substantial amount of interest amongst the students. Theenthusiasm and self discovery then generated considerable conversation about the impact ofthese strengths, and how the engineering transfer program might use this information to improvethe students’ educational experience. The experience was so positive, that the StrengthsQuesttool will be incorporated into the curriculum, and further results explored.
Lorimer, S., & Elford, E. (2012, June), StrengthsQuest for Engineers Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. 10.18260/1-2--21937
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2012 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015