Asee peer logo

Student curiosity in engineering courses and research experiences: “I'm kind of torn between being a decent student and a decent engineer.”

Download Paper |

Conference

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Baltimore , Maryland

Publication Date

June 25, 2023

Start Date

June 25, 2023

End Date

June 28, 2023

Conference Session

Student Experiences and Development – Session 2

Tagged Division

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

Tagged Topic

Diversity

Page Count

18

DOI

10.18260/1-2--42292

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/42292

Download Count

608

Paper Authors

biography

Natalie Evans University of Virginia

visit author page

Natalie Evans, Ph.D. is a postdoctoral research associate in the UVA school of Education and Human Development. Her research examines how educational experiences influence the development of curiosity and creativity in students from preschool through college.

visit author page

author page

Jessica Scoville University of Virginia

author page

Jamie J. Jirout University of Virginia

biography

Caitlin Donahue Wylie University of Virginia Orcid 16x16 orcid.org/0000-0002-0214-7837

visit author page

Caitlin D. Wylie is an associate professor of Science, Technology and Society in the University of Virginia's School of Engineering and Applied Science.

visit author page

author page

Elizabeth Opila

Download Paper |

Abstract

This mixed-methods research paper investigates how classes and research experiences affect undergraduate engineering students’ curiosity. Students become curious when they recognize a gap in their knowledge and seek to resolve this uncertainty [1]. When students are curious about a topic, their learning better generalizes to new material and contexts [2]. Both the classroom and the research lab are spaces where students regularly encounter uncertainty and new information and are ideal contexts to examine student curiosity. In the current study, we examined how students’ experiences in classes and research labs may foster and/or suppress their curiosity. Twenty undergraduate engineering students completed a self-report survey of curiosity and responded to questions about how different instructional elements impacted their curiosity. Eleven of these students also participated in a semi-structured interview about their class and research experiences. Survey responses suggest that hands-on activities and labs were most likely to make students feel curious and exams were least likely. In the interviews, students expressed that they experienced curiosity when their instructors were engaging and made connections to real world applications, whereas they felt less curious when they were overscheduled and when class content was redundant. Students noted that working in a research lab gave them more time to process information, develop questions, and build relationships with peers and mentors compared to their class experiences. We discuss the implications of these findings and offer suggestions for encouraging students’ curiosity in both class and research lab settings.

Evans, N., & Scoville, J., & Jirout, J. J., & Wylie, C. D., & Opila, E. (2023, June), Student curiosity in engineering courses and research experiences: “I'm kind of torn between being a decent student and a decent engineer.” Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--42292

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2023 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015