Asee peer logo

Student Motivation in a Peer Designed and Delivered Course

Download Paper |

Conference

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Columbus, Ohio

Publication Date

June 24, 2017

Start Date

June 24, 2017

End Date

June 28, 2017

Conference Session

Motivation

Tagged Division

Educational Research and Methods

Page Count

15

DOI

10.18260/1-2--28861

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/28861

Download Count

252

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Meagan R. Kendall University of Texas, El Paso

visit author page

Dr. Meagan R. Kendall received her PhD from The University of Texas at Austin where her research focused on the design of a low-cost, volume adjustable prosthetic socket. Now an Assistant Professor at The University of Texas at El Paso, she is helping develop a new Engineering Leadership Program to help students to bridge the gap between traditional engineering education and what they will really experience in industry. Her research interests span the areas of engineering education, biomechanics, and product design methodology.

visit author page

biography

Michele Carolynn Williams University of Texas, El Paso

visit author page

Background in Industrial & Systems Engineering with 15 years of experience, 7+ years of secondary STEM education, and currently Assistant Director at UT El Paso, grant administrator, creating and offering new engineering education courses for K-12 STEM teachers.
Graduate degrees in both Engineering and Education. Doctoral student at the dissertation stage. Research interests include: STEM focused schools and initiatives, Best practices for K-12 Engineering Education for the 21st century, college readiness, and general STEM education reform, policy and practice.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

This research paper delves into the impact that a unique, student-centered learning experience has on student motivation. Educators often attempt to focus on instructional tools that enhance motivation to excite students about learning and encourage them to become self-taught, lifelong learners. Under the assumption that students understand what motivates their peers best, a team of students, supervised by faculty, designed and taught an introduction to engineering course. This pedagogical approach, coined Peer Designed Instruction (PDI), proved useful and was maintained in this introduction to engineering course.

Couched in the Collaborative Learning literature, PDI deviates from current collaborative learning approaches in one notable way: the authority in the classroom shifts from the faculty member(s) to Student Instructors (SI). These Student Instructors are students that previously completed the course and returned to take on the responsibility for the design and delivery of learning experiences in the classroom. Faculty, therefore, assume a coaching role with the SIs and no longer act as the source of knowledge, educational material, and content delivery for the course.

This research paper delves into the impact that this learning experience has on student motivation. Using a survey developed based on the MUSIC Model of Academic Motivation Inventory®, the authors asked students to report their level of motivation in the introduction to engineering course implementing PDI as compared to their general university experience. Students reported a higher level of motivation in the MUSIC constructs of empowerment, success, and caring for the course using PDI and the same level in the areas of usefulness and interest. When comparing SI’s vs. Non-SI’s, no statistically significant difference in motivation was reported. When considering gender, there was no statistically significant difference between female and male respondents in the scales of empowerment and success. Female identifying students did feel that that the course implementing PDI was more useful than male identifying students. Similarly, female students felt that both the intro and the other courses were more interesting than male students. Finally, female students thought the intro course was more caring than the male students. Overall, students surveyed reported that they liked PDI. As a result of this study, enabling students to be instructors is a viable approach for improving student motivation in introductory engineering courses.

Kendall, M. R., & Williams, M. C. (2017, June), Student Motivation in a Peer Designed and Delivered Course Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. 10.18260/1-2--28861

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2017 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015