June 20, 2010
June 20, 2010
June 23, 2010
15.1124.1 - 15.1124.11
Student Understanding of Atomic Bonds and their Relation to Mechanical Properties of Metals in an Introductory Materials Science Engineering Course Abstract
We report on initial findings of a project to identify, study, and address student difficulties in a university-level introductory materials science course for engineers. Through interviews of over 80 students and testing of over 300 students, we examined in detail student understanding of the atomic bonding and mechanical properties of metals. Here we describe a number of student difficulties in understanding atomic bonding and its relation to macroscopic properties of metals. For example, students often confuse density, strength of atomic bonds, melting temperature, and yield strength. Many students also believe that when the temperature of a metal bar is increased, the metal expands “because the atoms are moving faster and need more room”. Students also often believe that bonds themselves can be permanently weakened or stretched, and they often confuse bond strength with force rather than energy. All of these results were obtained after traditional instruction that explicitly covered these topics. We describe active learning group-work lessons aimed at improving student understanding of atomic bonding which are similar in structure and style to lessons shown to be effective in physics education research efforts. Students were presented with an asymmetric atomic bonding potential energy curve and a symmetric potential energy curve for a “ball and spring” model of atomic bonding. They were then asked a series of questions comparing the behavior of the atoms in the two cases. This lesson was pilot tested in recitation sections, and we found students to be actively engaged in the exercises. At the end of the session students were able to explain on an atomic level why a metal expands when heated, the origin of elasticity of metals and why melting occurs when the temperature reaches a critical level. Previously, most students could not provide these explanations after traditional instruction.
Understanding atomic bonding and its relation to macroscopic material properties is a fundamental concept necessary for a basic understanding of materials science. In this paper we describe some of the initial findings of a project to identify, study, and address student difficulties in a university-level introductory materials science course for engineers. In particular, we describe a number of student difficulties in understanding the atomic structure and atomic bonding in metals, and the relation between the atomic bonding and structure and macroscopic properties of metals. In addition we briefly describe some pilot instructional materials developed to help overcome these student difficulties.
There are a several previous studies, including the development of a Materials Concept Inventory, that have identified and described some student difficulties with understanding atomic bonds and/or their relationship with material properties1-3. In an initial phase of this study, we administered the Materials Concept Inventory, which covers a wide range of topics, and found similar levels of student difficulties with atomic bonding. This current study was aimed at
Heckler, A., & Rosenblatt, R. (2010, June), Student Understanding Of Atomic Bonds And Their Relation To Mechanical Properties Of Metals In An Introductory Materials Science Engineering Course Paper presented at 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky. https://peer.asee.org/16423
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2010 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015