Asee peer logo

Sustaining Faculty Collaboration: An Exploratory Process-Based Study of Research Collaboration Across Universities

Download Paper |

Conference

2021 CoNECD

Location

Virtual - 1pm to 5pm Eastern Time Each Day

Publication Date

January 24, 2021

Start Date

January 24, 2021

End Date

January 28, 2021

Conference Session

CoNECD Session : Day 1 Slot 4 Technical Session 2

Tagged Topics

Diversity and CoNECD Paper Submissions

Page Count

15

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/36125

Download Count

32

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Yousef Jalali Virginia Tech

visit author page

Yousef Jalali is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He received a B.S. and M.S. in Chemical Engineering and M.Eng. in Energy Systems Engineering. His research interests include interaction between critical thinking, imagination, and ethical reasoning, interpersonal and interinstitutional collaboration, diversity, equity, and inclusion, systems thinking, and chemical engineering learning systems. Yousef taught chemical engineering courses for a few years in his home country, Iran, and first-year engineering courses for several semesters at Virginia Tech. He has provided service and leadership in different capacities at Lehigh University and Virginia Tech.

visit author page

biography

Christian Matheis Guilford College

visit author page

I serve as a visiting assistant professor of Community and Justice Studies in the Department of Justice and Policy Studies at Guilford College in Greensboro, NC. My research and teaching specializations bridge theoretical, empirical, and practical subjects informed by social and political philosophy, ethics, public policy, and direct-action organizing. In particular, my work emphasizes how both philosophy of liberation and practical strategies enacted in liberatory movements can play a key role in addressing contemporary ethical, political, and economic problems. Teaching and research concentrations include topics such as solidarity, refugees, feminism, race, indigeneity, power and policy, and global justice. In addition to my regular teaching and research, I also provide training and consulting in areas of human relations facilitation, intergroup dialogue, grassroots direct-action organizing, and other similar topics.

visit author page

biography

Christine Tysor Virginia Tech

visit author page

Chris Tysor is a Program Manager for the Mid-Atlantic Aviation Partnership and the Diversity and Inclusion Coordinator for the Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science (ICTAS) at Virginia Tech. She has been a Program Manager for large, interdisciplinary teams, individual PIs and managed DoD contracts since 2011. Diversity matters are very close to her heart and in 2016 the Institute Director asked her to become the Institute's first Diversity and Inclusion Coordinator. Chris manages the Diversity and Inclusion Investment Seed program at ICTAS which provides funding to Virginia Tech Principal Investigators to establish or build collaborative research relationships with faculty from Historically Black Colleges and University's-Minority Serving Institutions (HBCU-MSIs). Chris received her undergraduate degree from Old Dominion University in Exercise Science and her master's degree in Health Promotion from Virginia Tech. She was in the United States Navy for 8 years and was a naval aviator flying the venerable CH-46 Seaknight or "Phrog" as it was affectionately known. Chris currently holds the highest level of Diversity Ambassador Certification from the VT Diversity Development program.
Chris works closely with the Graduate School at Virginia Tech to help shape the annual HBCU-MSI Summit at Virginia Tech which is heading into it's fifth year. She is also working to build a more robust program for diversity programming and efforts at ICTAS. Chris resides in Christiansburg, VA.

visit author page

biography

Vinod K. Lohani Virginia Tech

visit author page

Dr. Vinod K. Lohani is a Professor of Engineering Education and is W.S. 'Pete' White Chair for Innovation in Engineering Education. He is the founding director of an interdisciplinary lab called Learning Enhanced Watershed Assessment System (LEWAS) at VT. He received a Ph.D. in civil engineering from VT. His research interests are in the areas of computer-supported research and learning systems, hydrology, engineering education, and international collaboration. He has served as a PI or co-PI on 18 projects, funded by the National Science Foundation, with a $8.4 million research funding participation from external sources. He has been directing/co-directing an NSF/Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) Site on interdisciplinary water sciences and engineering at VT since 2007. This site has 115 alumni to date. He also leads an NSF/Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) site on interdisciplinary water research and have 25 alumni. He also leads an NSF-funded cybersecurity education project and serves as a co-PI on two International Research Experiences for Students (IRES) projects funded by the NSF. He has published over 100 papers in peer-reviewed journals and conferences.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

A unique seed funding program has been deployed at a major research institute at a large land-grant university. The program aims to build direct faculty-to-faculty research partnerships between faculty at a predominantly white institution (PWI) and faculty at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and other minority-serving institutions (MSIs). Funds are awarded based on a peer review conducted by faculty with a vested interest in growing HBCU/MSI research partnerships. The proposal review criteria are adapted from NSF and include evaluation of intellectual merit and broader impacts of the proposed work. The proposal writers are expected to: (i) clearly identify their partnership with an HBCU/MSI, (ii) describe plans for next steps such as joint proposals or joint publications, (iii) discuss the degree that proposed research can affect a significant population, and (iv) describe sustainability of collaboration beyond one year. Funds may be used for shared lab equipment and space, shared technologies, or traveling to develop partnerships. Within the last three years, 23 HBCUs/MSIs have been engaged in the program. The ultimate goal of the program is to develop robust partnership.

Scholars have placed emphasis on the collaborative work among faculty. Professional development and faculty growth (Austin and Baldwin, 1991; Clark, et al. 1996), developing the links and social capital (Bozeman, et al. 2013), learning and innovations (Creamer, 2004), and publications and knowledge production (Austin and Baldwin, 1991; Bozeman, et al. 2013) are among some of the major benefits of research collaboration that have been portrayed within the literature. It should also be noted that some increasing specialization, creation of new subfields, and increasing need for productivity and accountability are among external factors that encourage research collaboration among faculty (Baldwin and Austin, 1995; Younglove-Webb, et al. 1999). Some scholars assert the importance of the quality of relationships among collaborators. Kraut, et al. (1987) described personal relationship as the glue that holds the constituents of a collaborative endeavor together. However, there has been a gap in the literature with respect to the process of collaboration. In a critical review of the literature on research collaboration at university---individual-level---, Bozeman, et al. (2013) argued that there is underrepresentation of studies examining the dynamics of relationships between researchers. When it comes to collaboration across the institutions, the situation is even less encouraging. Overall, there has been very little research on collaboration across institutions (Duffield, et al. 2013). In general, higher education institutions are not designed and structured to collaborate due to differences in their identities and missions (Duffield, et al. 2013). In particular contemporary research indicates the relative ease and preponderance of intra-institutional collaborations as compared with the difficulty and rarity of inter-institutional collaborations, such as between HBCUs/MSIs and PWIs. Moreover, inter-institutional collaborations among PWIs, research intensive institutions appear far more well supported and likely than between HBCUs/MSIs and PWIs. There is no doubt that factors such as power differentials and race play a role in the dynamics of collaborations. Hardy and Phillips (1998) argued that researchers in interorganizational domain should be careful not to adopt the position of powerful stakeholder when they judge about the success of collaboration. There is a concern that a given situation gets represented as “normal”.

Within engineering education, while there have been some studies on research collaboration, the quality of relationships has often been underemphasized. Borrego and Newswander (2008), for example, interviewed 24 co-authors from cross-disciplinary teams to better understand cross-disciplinary collaboration in engineering education research. The authors defined successful engineering education collaboration as those resulting in publication in Journal of Engineering Education.

What if we move beyond this product-oriented picture? What if we get to the dynamics of inter-personal relationships to better understand the quality of collaboration? Rather than focusing on functional aspects and emphasis on the outcomes of the collaborative activities such as presupposed objectives, often defined without paying appropriate attention to the nature and process of collaboration, this study focuses on the process-oriented illustration of collaboration and explores the nature/quality of the research collaborations, as a result of the seed funding program, in particular by focusing on broad questions about the sustainability of research collaboration. In this study, we distinguish between conventional outcome and holistic outcome, based on which research proposals or publications are considered as conventional outcome or indicator of conventional success, and quality of collaboration and in particular relationships between individuals as holistic outcome or indicator of holistic success. The purpose of this project is to gain a better understanding of the nature of collaboration to not only capture and present the participants’ voices but also connect thought and praxis in ways that can transform the status quo.

This paper aims to catalyze attention to the subject of process-based collaboration and shed light on theories, frameworks, and “thinking tools” that can resolve some of the complexities embedded in engaging in such studies. We elaborate on theoretical aspects of collaboration and briefly review the plan for a process-based study of research collaboration in the context of the seed funding program. In this paper, we first review the literature within engineering education and highlight the limitations. Second, we expand on the concept of the process of (research) collaboration and its importance informed by the literature. Then, we explore different views towards the role of theory in studying research collaboration. Finally, we briefly review the research design and address the major propositions that may provide an account and explain different factors that influence the sustainability of research collaboration.

References: Austin, A.E. and Baldwin, R.G. (1991). Faculty collaboration: Enhancing the quality of Scholarship and Teaching, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, No. 7, Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development. Baldwin, R.G. and Austin, A.E. (1995). Toward greater understanding of faculty research collaboration, The Review of Higher Education, 19, 2, 45-70. Borrego, M. and Newswander, L.K. (2008). Characteristics of successful cross-disciplinary engineering education collaborations, Journal of Engineering Education, 97, 2, 123-134. Bozeman, B., Fay, D., and Slade, C.P. (2013). “Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art,” Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1-67. Clark, C., Moss, P.A., Goering, S., Herter, R.J., Lamar, B., Leonard, D., Robbins, S., Russel, M., Templin, M., and Wascha, K. (1996). Collaboration as dialogue: Teachers and researchers engaged in conversation and professional development, American Educational Research Journal, 33, 1, 193-231. Creamer, E.G. (2004). Assessing outcomes of long-term research collaboration, The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, XXXIV, 1, 27-46. Duffield, S., Olson, A., Kerzman, R. (2013). Crossing borders, breaking boundaries: Collaboration among higher education institutions, Innovative Higher Education, 38, 3, 237-250. Hardy, C. and Phillips, N. (1998). Strategies of engagement: Lessons from critical examination of collaboration and conflict in an interorganizational domain, Organization Science, 9, 2, 217-230. Kraut, R.E. Galegher, J. and Egido, C. (1987). “Relationships and tasks in scientific research collaboration,” Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 31-58. Younglove-Webb, J. Gray, B., Abdalla, C. W., and Thurow, A.P. (1999). The dynamics of multidisciplinary research teams in academia, 22, 4, 425-440.

Jalali, Y., & Matheis, C., & Tysor, C., & Lohani, V. K. (2021, January), Sustaining Faculty Collaboration: An Exploratory Process-Based Study of Research Collaboration Across Universities Paper presented at 2021 CoNECD, Virtual - 1pm to 5pm Eastern Time Each Day . https://peer.asee.org/36125

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2021 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015