Albuquerque, New Mexico
June 24, 2001
June 24, 2001
June 27, 2001
6.929.1 - 6.929.7
Teaching a Rigorous Problem-Solving Framework in Entry-Level Mechanical Engineering Courses – Theory and Practice Gregory G. Kremer Ohio University
Although students in entry-level mechanical engineering courses have been through the Calculus and Physics sequence, they are often unprepared for the “new thinking” required to solve engineering analysis problems. The process of reading a description of a physical situation, deciding which analytical theory applies, converting the physical situation into a solvable mathematical model, and finally visualizing the forces and motions to evaluate the physical realism of the solution can be a daunting task. This paper studies the use of a problem-solving framework in a Dynamics class to help students to develop the skills needed for solving engineering mechanics problems. The framework initially serves as a “crutch” that helps students work their way from problem statement through solution, but ultimately it allows students to focus more on understanding key concepts because they are relieved of some pressure related to figuring out what to do next. Although assessment results from using a rigorous framework in the course have been generally positive, students are still reluctant to do what is perceived as “extra work” when they think they immediately know how to solve a problem and will abandon the framework in such cases if given the opportunity.
When determining the most appropriate method of presenting material in an engineering course, many factors must be considered. Chief among these factors are the intellectual maturity level of the students and the desired objective or outcome of the course. Upper-level students should be given the freedom and responsibility of semi-autonomous learning, but entry-level engineering students often require a more structured format and more guidance both in what to learn and how to learn. Relative to course objectives, the major question is whether the emphasis should be on process or content. In other words, should successful students walk away from the course with an understanding of certain concepts and topics, or should they be skilled in applying a process for dealing with relatively generic problem situations. These issues have been considered extensively at Ohio University in relation to the entry-level engineering courses, and this paper reviews our attempts to increase student learning in a sophomore-level Dynamics course by increasing the emphasis on problem-solving frameworks.
The goal of increasing learning is a common one but is very abstract. In order to realize this goal it is necessary to identify student learning needs and current course deficiencies, implement concrete changes to a specific course or throughout the curriculum, monitor the effects of the changes, and reiterate the process for continuous improvement. The details of this process for a Dynamics course are given in the next section - this section focuses on one of the options for
Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering Education
Kremer, G. (2001, June), Teaching A Rigorous Problem Solving Framework In Entry Level Mechanical Engineering Courses – Theory And Practice Paper presented at 2001 Annual Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico. https://peer.asee.org/9848
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2001 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015