Seattle, Washington
June 14, 2015
June 14, 2015
June 17, 2015
978-0-692-50180-1
2153-5965
Mechanical Engineering
13
26.1466.1 - 26.1466.13
10.18260/p.24803
https://peer.asee.org/24803
521
Dr. Jenifer Blacklock is the Assistant Department Head in the Mechanical Engineering department at Colorado School of Mines. Blacklock is active in the Undergraduate Curriculum in the Mechanical Engineering department and is an advocate of using hands-on learning tools to help develop strong math, science, and engineering foundations.
Jered is Director of the Mines College of Engineering and Computational Sciences Capstone Design Program and is passionate about teaching students engineering through project based learning. He received both his BS and MS degrees in Engineering from Colorado School of Mines. In addition to leading capstone, Jered is the faculty adviser for the Mines SAE Baja team, Anonymous Right Brains Club, and CSM Racing Club.
Assessment of Teaching and Learning Open-‐Ended Problem Solving Throughout a New Degree Program The concept of ‘Design’ is a significant challenge for faculty to teach and students to learn. At the Colorado School of Mines (CSM), we have created a standard and simple definition along with student learning assessment tools to improve students’ ability and comfort to solve open-‐ended design problems. The Mechanical Engineering (ME) degree program is currently in the process of implementing open-‐ended design problems throughout recently-‐accredited Mechanical Engineering Undergraduate curriculum. Open-‐Ended Design problems are challenging for students when they are confronted with the fact that there is no ‘right numerical answer’ for them to achieve. The uncertainty of no one ‘right’ answer is unnerving to students. Open-‐Ended Design problem-‐solving is a difficult concept for faculty to teach to students and for students to learn and internalize from faculty because solving Open-‐Ended Design problems requires a holistic approach that is not taught in analytic courses. In this study we have developed and refined the curriculum to produce students who are capable of and confident in holistically solving open-‐ended problems in a design context. As a faculty, we are keenly aware of the need to improve the well-‐roundedness of our students so that they are capable of looking at a problem holistically and from a system perspective. We see the engineering design process and Open-‐Ended Problem Solving as vehicles for developing well-‐rounded engineers who are ready to enter the workforce. The ME department at CSM has a unique opportunity to revisit fundamental concepts taught throughout the curriculum. In Fall 2013, the department went through the accreditation process for a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering degree, which was a transition from the previously offered B.S. in General Engineering with a Mechanical specialty. In July 2014, the ME department became ABET accredited under the new degree offerings. The split of the former Engineering Division provided a unique opportunity for the faculty to take a new look at the curriculum and begin to implement significant changes throughout. We have started the process of following our students to be holistic system thinkers who are capable of and confident in tackling difficult Open-‐Ended Problems and Design challenges of the future. To achieve this, we have taken a “baseline snapshot” of the current ME classes in order to have a clear understanding of the current state of our students’ abilities. We have conducted preliminary surveying that strongly indicates our students are largely incapable of tackling Open-‐Ended Problems and that our students do not understand Design. We will implement surveys throughout our undergraduate curriculum to track students’ performance and improvement over time. We will follow students throughout a five year period and analyze their ability to solve Open-‐Ended Problems while making changes to the curriculum, one step at a time.
Blacklock, J., & Dean, J. H. (2015, June), Teaching and Learning Open-Ended Problem Solving Throughout a New Degree Program Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.24803
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2015 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015