June 24, 2007
June 24, 2007
June 27, 2007
12.1350.1 - 12.1350.5
Teaching Classical Control in ET programs; time for reassessment?
This paper is based on the recommendations made by the National Science Foundation and Control Systems Society of IEEE. In light of those recommendations and issues discussed at a NSF/CSS workshop, the author raises the question of appropriate contents for a control system course as taught in a typical first course ET program. Presently, the majority of electrical, some mechanical and almost all electromechanical engineering technology programs have a course in their curriculum called control systems. Even though they carry the same name, most often their contents are drastically different. In many programs the focus of the course is on the application of typical classical control. There are some programs where the whole course is about application and programming of micro-controllers. There are also programs where the emphasis of the course is entirely on the study of instrumentation and programmable logic controllers. In this paper an attempt will be made to find an answer to the question of what is the appropriate content for a typical first course in control systems to be taught in a typical ET program. The argument will be made that the recommendations made by NSF and Control System Society of IEEE can easily be implemented and therefore should be considered.
The control area has been structured in the recent years in a process that includes, for instance, foundation of IFAC (International Federation of Automatic Control). In this maturing process, different works, as Blondell6 and Antsaklis1 have addressed general questions, such as control challenges in the new millennium. Those works are based on discussions performed by control communities, arising as relevant consolidated opinions based on individual experiences. At the same time, other works, as Kheir7 and Heck2, approach control education, with many scenarios based on technological learning process. The main purpose of this paper is to broaden the scope of the discussion and get the ET educators involved in it. Therefore, in the next sections, an attempt is made to analyze the role of a classic control course in an ET curriculum. The question that needs to be addressed is whether or not a control course is an essential part of an ET curriculum and if yes what are the appropriate course contents.
Need for reassessment
The field of control systems science and engineering has entered a golden age of unprecedented growth and opportunity. These opportunities for growth are being spurred by enormous advances in computer technology, material science, sensor and actuator technology, as well as in the theoretical foundations of dynamical systems and control. Control system technology is the cornerstone of the new automation revolution occurring in such diverse areas as household appliances, consumer electronics, automotive and aerospace systems, manufacturing systems,
Zia, O. (2007, June), Teaching Classical Control In Et Programs; Time For Reassessment? Paper presented at 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. https://peer.asee.org/1819
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2007 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015