Asee peer logo

Team Teaching: A Freshman Engineering Rhetoric & Laboratory

Download Paper |

Conference

1996 Annual Conference

Location

Washington, District of Columbia

Publication Date

June 23, 1996

Start Date

June 23, 1996

End Date

June 26, 1996

ISSN

2153-5965

Page Count

9

Page Numbers

1.435.1 - 1.435.9

DOI

10.18260/1-2--6340

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/6340

Download Count

450

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

David F. Ollis

author page

Ann Brown

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Session 1 2 6 1

Team Teaching: A Freshman Engineering Rhetoric and Laboratory

Ann B r o w n ( C o l l e g e o f E n g i n e e r i n g W r i t i n g A s s i s t a n c e P r o g r a m ) and David F. Ollis (Chemical Engineering) North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695

Abstract

Team teaching usually involves the back-and-forth trading of lecturing between two instructors. The present example illustrates a looser side- by-side collaboration consisting of a first year rhetoric, based upon readings, poetry, and videos in technology, literature and history, and a “hands-on” laboratory centered around consumer electronics. The effect achieved is a bridging of the “two cultures” by viewing technology through alternating sets of glasses.

Introduction

Directors of university engineering curricula are besieged by ever noisier clamour for more and earlier “hands-on” experience, and for more exposure to, and practice in, reading and writing “across the curriculum” in course-centered formats. The freshman year is a logical target for new course innovation, e x c e p t f o r t h e o b v i o u s p r o b l e m t h a t t h e f i r s t engineering year often has few, if any, elective spaces for new, widely available experiments in engineering education. Therefore, new first y e a r c o u r s e s a r e e x p e c t e d t o p a t t e r n themselves after existing requirements, in order to satisfy the argument of the type “please accept new course X in lieu of current Y“. A new example from our NCSU College of Engineering is an integrated version of mathematics, physics, and chemistry, known as IMPEC and described in the preceding paper (l); here the challenge is largely curricular integration to give physics or chemistry a “just-in- time” mathematics component, all spiced with design examples from

---- {iiii’1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings ) ‘.JRYR’: .

Ollis, D. F., & Brown, A. (1996, June), Team Teaching: A Freshman Engineering Rhetoric & Laboratory Paper presented at 1996 Annual Conference, Washington, District of Columbia. 10.18260/1-2--6340

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 1996 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015