Louisville, Kentucky
June 20, 2010
June 20, 2010
June 23, 2010
2153-5965
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
16
15.1194.1 - 15.1194.16
10.18260/1-2--16984
https://peer.asee.org/16984
369
Technological literacy through a K-5 teacher preparation program
Introduction Attaining a certain level of technological literacy in our society is important for a variety of reasons. In this extremely technologically-rich age, citizenry will need to participate effectively in our democratic society on a variety of complex problems; such as global warming, energy supply, quick-paced biomedical advances, complicated healthcare reform and statistical-based arguments galore. This will require a level of technological, quantitative and scientific literacy. One might call this STEM-literacy, where the literacy level not only includes literacy in each on the four components but also in how the four components work synergistically together. Additionally, technology/engineering can provide valuable contextual education settings resulting in effective learning (of math, science and “non- technical” subjects like history, social studies and language arts). At our institution, The College of New Jersey (TCNJ), it was felt that an effective place to impact technological literacy, as well as increase the effectiveness of teaching and learning is with future K-5 teachers. So, approximately 10 years ago a multidisciplinary science-technology- engineering-math (“STEM”) K-5 major was defined and implemented, where the teacher candidates receive a deep level of content knowledge in all four STEM components, as well as education tools for “integrated-STEM”. 1 The program is referred to as the Math/Science/Technology, or MST, program, even though all four elements of STEM are represented in the program. [That is, a more accurate name would have been the “STEM” K- 5 program.]
An obvious potential benefit of the MST program is numerical in nature; an effective technologically literate K-5 teacher should impact the willingness to “think and learn technologically” for thousands of young students, and hundreds of colleagues. Another large potential benefit is pedagogical in nature and deals with, for example, deeper contextual learning and open-ended design/problem-solving. With deep experiences in all four areas of STEM, our K-5 MST graduates have high content knowledge and high skill levels in STEM, resulting in overall higher teacher effectiveness. Perhaps more importantly, MST program graduates have comfort (low anxiety) in a broad set of subjects and experiences.
In this paper we give a detailed description of (i) the K-5 MST program, (ii) a brief overview of a quantitative characterization of the program and (iii) unique research topics made possible with our K-5 STEM graduates and their students.
Summary: The K-5 MST program at our institution offers a unique opportunity both for increasing teacher effectiveness and K-5 student interest in STEM and non-STEM subjects. However, having a population of technologically literate K-5(8) teachers and teacher candidates also offers many unique research opportunities. [The definition of “technologically literate” here likely entails being literate to some degree in the S, M and T&E.] Leaving the teaching effectiveness benefits aside, a population of technologically literate K-5 teachers, and presumably their K-5(8) students, should enable technological literacy instruments to be better designed and calibrated. This has broad implications. Measurements of technological
O'Brien, S. (2010, June), Technological Literacy In A K 5 Teacher Preparation Program Paper presented at 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky. 10.18260/1-2--16984
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2010 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015