Asee peer logo

The Benefits Of Transparency In Managing Software Capstone Projects

Download Paper |


2010 Annual Conference & Exposition


Louisville, Kentucky

Publication Date

June 20, 2010

Start Date

June 20, 2010

End Date

June 23, 2010



Conference Session

SE Curriculum and Projects

Tagged Division

Software Engineering Constituent Committee

Page Count


Page Numbers

15.1207.1 - 15.1207.13



Permanent URL

Download Count


Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Kevin Gary Arizona State University

author page

Harry Koehnemann Arizona State University

Download Paper |

NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

The Benefits of Transparency in Managing Software Engineering Capstone Projects


This paper describes the impact of an agile process support environment in helping faculty manage software engineering capstone projects and the learning outcomes associated with the capstone experience. Software engineering capstone projects are notoriously time-consuming to manage for faculty mentors. Team projects often fall behind due to the inexperience of the students and the external pressures they face. They may be accustomed to performing heroic acts on prior individual class projects, and think they can be successful this way again. But in a significantly sized real-world team project, they find out too late that this approach will not work. Students remain successful often by significant effort on the part of a faculty mentor. The mentor may setup a process infrastructure to enables project monitoring. Mentors may find themselves asking for frequent in-class project reviews, out-of-class appointments, and significant documentation. Mentoring a capstone project, while a potentially rewarding experience, can become a significant time sink and lead to faculty burnout. We are utilizing the IBM Jazz environment including the Rational Team Concert (RTC) integrated development environment (IDE) to address project management for capstone projects using the Agile/Scrum methodology. Jazz/RTC allows all stakeholders (students, sponsors, and faculty) to transparently review a process to assess project health at any point in time. Further, transparent continuous project monitoring gives mentors the ability to provide just-in-time-but-not-too-late formative feedback, as well as allow continuous assessment of learning outcomes. The ability to “see where you are” in the process, and understand how the process’ practices drive progress and completion, is an invaluable learning aid for students struggling to grasp the benefits of these methods.

1. Introduction

Mentoring software engineering capstone projects is a challenging yet rewarding task for any motivated faculty member. On the one hand, there is no better place in which to see the fruits of one’s labor than when working alongside student teams as they “put it all together” and produce a real software product. Observing that moment where the students show they have integrated and internalized what the faculty taught them for several years offset concern that some “may never get it.” On the other hand, it is challenging for many reasons. One challenge is strictly a time management issue. Capstone project mentoring often involves meta-project management by the instructor-as-facilitator. Ensuring teams are planning, estimating, and tracking detailed work can be a laborious process, no matter what software development lifecycle (SDLC) model has been adopted. In industry, how many projects is a dedicated project manager expected to manage at a time? In academia, with expectations of working on real-world projects with real-world sponsors and deliverables, how many projects can a faculty member meta-manage in the fraction of time allocated to this responsibility? It is imperative that faculty have available tools to productively assess the ongoing progress of software engineering capstone projects.

Gary, K., & Koehnemann, H. (2010, June), The Benefits Of Transparency In Managing Software Capstone Projects Paper presented at 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky. 10.18260/1-2--16985

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2010 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015