New Orleans, Louisiana
June 26, 2016
June 26, 2016
August 28, 2016
Educational Research and Methods
The Converged Classroom: A Follow Up Study This is an Evidence-Based Practice paper. There has been much discussion in recent years about the quality of online course offerings versus traditional face to face. We have developed delivery system that we believe eliminates much of the difference and consequently the cause for disagreement. We call these offerings “converged” courses. The Initial Study: Before 2009, all of the major courses in our Industrial Engineering Technology program were offered in a traditional face to face format. That year, we began to offer Hybrid course delivery. In the traditional format, classes met twice a week for a total of 150 minutes. Hybrid courses meet once a week for 75 minutes with an additional 75 minutes of instruction online in the form of prerecorded lectures and exercises. We also began to offer online courses using the same hybrid structure, but the weekly 75 minute class meeting was done using our course management system, and a live synchronous class meeting. The final step to “converged” courses was to combine the traditional and online course meetings. This effort began in 2011. Initially, there was some performance difference between the traditional and online students. This was later attributed to a faculty learning curve with online delivery. By 2012, there appeared to be little difference in student performance between the delivery methods. This was documented in a paper and presentation at the 2013 ASEE National Conference. Student Benefits • Increased flexibility • Students can self select the delivery method that fits them best. • Recorded learning materials and archives of live sessions can be reviewed as needed. • Classroom students can, when necessary attend a class online. • Interaction with faculty and peers for online students. • Significant changes in life circumstances do not have to interrupt education. Institutional Benefits Combining traditional and online sections results in larger more viable class sizes, lessening the chance of course cancellations. • Consistency in content delivery between traditional and online offerings. • Better utilization of faculty workload. • Better utilization of classroom space. In the original study, which was done soon after full implementation, the primary measure was success. Success was defined as the percentage of students earning a C or better in a course. The Follow Up Study: The follow up study will extend that analysis by three full years. We now have data from over 250 course offerings for comparisons. The paper will examine other, more granular indicators such as grade point averages, grade distribution, grade variance, and end of course evaluations to compare online and on campus students. We will also examine long term trends in graduation and retention and possible effects of this approach. This will provide a richer body of knowledge for the converged classroom approach.
Bailey, B. D., & Wiles, G. L., & Ball, T. R. (2016, June), The Converged Classroom: A Follow-up Study Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.26112
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2016 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015