Asee peer logo

The Four Domain Development Diagram: A Tool For Designing Development Centered Teaching

Download Paper |


2008 Annual Conference & Exposition


Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Publication Date

June 22, 2008

Start Date

June 22, 2008

End Date

June 25, 2008



Conference Session

Student Engagement and Motivation

Tagged Division

Educational Research and Methods

Page Count


Page Numbers

13.1231.1 - 13.1231.11



Permanent URL

Download Count


Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Linda Vanasupa California Polytechnic State University

author page

Trevor Harding California Polytechnic State University

author page

William Hughes California Polytechnic State University

Download Paper |

NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

The Four-Domain Development Diagram: A tool for designing development-centered teaching Abstract

Research in education has brought to light the complexity of the learning process, demonstrating that students' development is influenced by a myriad of cultural and social factors, as well as the environment in which learning takes place. Engineering curricula, however, are primarily focused on teaching content knowledge, often resulting in a gap between what is taught and what is learned. We propose that shifting some of the focus onto the process of learning that occurs within the student and leveraging multiple known connections from educational psychology can result in more effective engineering education. Here we define “effective” engineering education as that which leads to greater retention of knowledge, accelerated skills development, and enhanced motivation for life-long learning. We have developed a curriculum design tool to facilitate this shift. It is a diagram that makes explicit the connections between properties of the "learning environment" or "cognitive activity" and the development occurring within the student. The Four-Domain Development Diagram, a synthesis of known empirical relationships in the learning literature, enables a faculty member to take a systems approach while designing learning activities. For example, it is known that several factors increase the construct of intrinsic motivation (a key ingredient in self-directed learning) such as students' valuation of the material being learned, autonomy in the learning process, a sense of relatedness in the learning environment and experiencing mastery. Unlike other models of learning which focus on the independent influence of one or two constructs, such as student interest or choice, our diagram enables one to design the learning experience to utilize the multiple natural known-relationships within the learner’s development to promote a greater internal drive for learning.

Over the course of a three-year period, three cohorts (totaling ~120 students) have participated in learning experiences which have been designed according to the relationships in the Four- Domain Development Diagram. Engineering students in "learning experiences" designed according to the diagram report significantly higher levels of interaction with peers as learning collaborators, greater use of integrative cognitive strategies during self-directed learning and a higher degree of moral reasoning than comparison groups (these results are being published elsewhere). While it is not possible to establish a definitive cause-effect relationship, the results provide encouraging signs that the diagram can be useful as a design guide for simultaneously leveraging natural causal relationships leading to students' development along cognitive, affective, psychomotor and social domains. In this paper, we present the model and its key theoretical and empirical underpinnings. We also provide examples of how it can been used.


Many blue-ribbon reports outline the complexities of the 21st century and articulate the new skill set that is required for graduates in science and technical fields1,2. In addition to mastery of their discipline, they call for the ability to function on multidisciplinary teams, think holistically, and engage in self-directed learning. Leah Jamisen, Dean of Purdue's college of engineering, also calls for "reflection,"3 a critical practice of moral and ethical

Vanasupa, L., & Harding, T., & Hughes, W. (2008, June), The Four Domain Development Diagram: A Tool For Designing Development Centered Teaching Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 10.18260/1-2--3808

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2008 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015