June 15, 2019
June 15, 2019
October 19, 2019
Electrical and Computer
Studies repeatedly show improvements in learning, achievement, and success for students after implementation of active-learning and student centered teaching practices. Active learning improves retention of content, achievement level, and success in courses (Felder, Woods et al. 2000, Freeman, Eddy et al. 2014). This paper describes the impacts on student learning and downstream success after a course transformation in a freshman level Electrical Engineering/Computer Science course, Introduction to Digital Logic Design. Introduction to Digital Design is a fairly standard course included in most Electrical Engineering and Computer Science curricula. It is an introductory course in digital logic circuits covering number representation, digital codes, Boolean algebra, combinatorial logic design, sequential logic design, and programmable logic devices. A previous study found evidence of improved learning in a fully-flipped version of the course compared to an “active learning” version of the course. This paper seeks to broaden the scope of this work by investigating multiple semesters worth of student performance data and by examining downstream student success and particularly the success of women, under-represented minorities, and first-generation college students. The research questions are: : 1) Does student performance on learning objectives improve in the fully flipped version of the course compared to the active learning version? 2) Is student success in the course improved in the active and/or flipped versions of the course compared to traditional lecture? 3) Is student success differentially impacted for under-represented groups? 4) What are student perceptions of the fully flipped course model? To address the first question, performance on exam questions mapped to the same learning objective will be compared between the active learning semester (Fall 2017) and two semesters of the fully-flipped course (Spring 2018 and Fall 2018). Additionally, DFW rates in the active and fully-flipped courses will be compared to DFW rates from the previous eight semesters of the course taught in a traditional lecture format. Finally, student surveys will be analyzed to determine student perceptions of the fully-flipped course.
Johnson, D. O., & McVey, M. A., & Melgares, C. P. (2019, June), The Impact of Course Transformation on Student Learning and Success in Fundamental Electrical Engineering/Computer Science Courses Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--33394
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2019 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015