San Antonio, Texas
June 10, 2012
June 10, 2012
June 13, 2012
2153-5965
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
14
25.1334.1 - 25.1334.14
10.18260/1-2--22091
https://peer.asee.org/22091
495
John Heywood is Professorial Fellow Emeritus of Trinity College, Dublin, and was formerly professor and Director of Teacher Education in the university. He holds an M.Sc. in engineering engineering education among his qualifications. He is a Fellow of ASEE and a Sen MIEEE. His interest in policy making was stimulated while he was Senior Research Fellow in higher technological education at Birmigham College of Advanced Technology in the 1960s. He has directed the research unit of an Irish Government Committe on School examinations, advised the U.K. Employment Department on the Assessment of Enterprise Learning and undertaken research sponsored by the same department with the purpose of classifying the objectives for training technologists and technicians. He has authored 12 books and co-authored two and published many papers. His book on Engineering Education: Research and Development in Curriculum and Instruction received and award from the division for the professions of the American Educational Research Association for the best research publication in the field in 2005. He is particularly interested in the philosophy of engineering education.
Engineering at the Cross Roads. Implications for Educational PolicyMakersEducational policy making is seldom discussed at meetings of engineering educators exceptin so far as they relate to implementation, as for example the response to ABET 2000 in theUnited States or the Bologna agreement in Europe. Worse evaluation of such policies is oftenhaphazard and changes in the curriculum are often predicated by technological change. Someare large such as the development of computer science and technology courses, the need forbio-engineering relevant courses etc. Some are small and the process of curriculum change isa continuous flow of small changes. Policy makers in most countries try to look ahead, as forexample “The Engineer of 2020” but such reports are based on current outlook and currentpredictions. Present polices for higher education are predicated on the belief that a highlyqualified engineering and scientific manpower is required and that specified numbers ofengineers and scientists are required to maintain economic wealth. This had contributed to thegrowth of specialisms: but, in recent years it has become evident that the axioms on whicheducational programmes of this nature are constructed no longer hold. First, jobs are nolonger for life and it is held that people have to be much more flexible. Second, there is thepossibility that the axiom that new technologies necessarily create new jobs is breakingdown. These are broad issues that have not been tackled by those responsible for highereducation policy and by implication engineering education policy makers. The purpose ofthis paper is to consider the implications of technologically structured social change for thehigher education curriculum and, in particular, engineering literacy.
Heywood, J. (2012, June), The Response of Higher and Technological Education to Changing Patterns of Employment Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. 10.18260/1-2--22091
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2012 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015