Chin, R. A., & Agarwala, R. (2019, June), The Scientific Influence of the Journal of Engineering Technology  Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--33422

\bibitem{asee_peer_33422}
  Chin, R. A., \& Agarwala, R. (2019, June), \emph{The Scientific Influence of the Journal of Engineering Technology}
  Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition , Tampa, Florida.
  10.18260/1-2--33422

Robert A. Chin and Ranjeet Agarwala.  "The Scientific Influence of the Journal of Engineering Technology".  2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida, 2019, June.  ASEE Conferences, 2019.  https://peer.asee.org/33422 Internet.  16 Apr, 2024

\bibitem{asee_peer_33422}
  Robert A. Chin and Ranjeet Agarwala.
  "The Scientific Influence of the Journal of Engineering Technology".
  \emph{2019 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition , Tampa, Florida, 2019, June}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2019.
  https://peer.asee.org/33422 Internet.  16 Apr, 2024

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_33422
author = "Robert A. Chin and Ranjeet Agarwala"
title = "The Scientific Influence of the Journal of Engineering Technology"
booktitle = "2019 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition "
year = "2019"
month = "June"
address = "Tampa, Florida"
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://peer.asee.org/33422}
number = {10.18260/1-2--33422}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - Selected metrics were examined that characterize the Journal of Engineering Technology's prestige ranking or scientific influence. Prestige rankings are a result of an iterative process based on the transfer of prestige from a journal to another, using current year citations to the source items published in that journal during the previous three years. This contrasts with the oft-cited Impact Factor, which is a measure of average citations per document. The purpose of this examination was to provide researchers, authors, and the Journal’s staff—the Journal's stakeholders—with guidance on improving the performance of the Journal and thus its scientific influence. Because the data are normalized to account for differences between the disciplines, the data can be used to make comparisons among peer journals. The metrics used to characterize the Journal included but were not limited to the following: its standing with respect to peer journals—prestige; its average prestige per article; the relationship between the total number of citations and journal's self-citations; the relationship between the number of total citations per document and external citations per document less self-citations; the relationship between the average number of times documents published in a journal in the past two, three and four years have been cited in the current year; the ratio of the journal's documents authored by researchers from more than one country; the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research in three year windows verses those documents other than research articles, reviews and conference papers; and the ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once verses those not cited during the following year. From 1999 through 2017, with respect to overall prestige, the Journal languished between the second and fourth quartiles among their peers in engineering (miscellaneous)—the fourth exclusively the last 7 years. Data exists: mined and analyzed, the results can serve as a catalyst to improve the Journal’s scientific influence or prestige. [323]
AU  - Robert A. Chin
AU  - Ranjeet Agarwala
CY  - Tampa, Florida
DA  - 2019/06/15
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - The Scientific Influence of the Journal of Engineering Technology
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/33422
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--33422
ER  -