June 18, 2006
June 18, 2006
June 21, 2006
11.1330.1 - 11.1330.9
THE SHOW MUST GO ON Reflections On The Pursuit Of Engineering Through Inter- Disciplinary Design Challenges
Several recent studies have expressed concern about the small numbers of Americans receiving degrees in engineering and related fields relative to other countries, and have called for sharp increases in engineering enrollments and degrees. Yet, the number of high school graduates choosing engineering as a major has increased only slowly and the attrition rate of students in engineering programs remains alarmingly high. The success in attracting increasing numbers of women, blacks, Hispanics, and Native Americans into engineering has also been discouraging.1,2,3
One of the most significant barriers to increasing engineering enrollments and persistence has been the prevailing stereotypes of engineers and the engineering education. Too often, engineers are perceived as nerds, lacking social skills, but possessing arcane technical knowledge that is beyond the grasp of “normal” people.2, p.37 An engineering education is perceived by many as an unremitting grind that only math geniuses and those willing to forego a social life should even consider. These stereotypes are reinforced by engineering curricula that utilize mathematics as an entry hurdle to weed out those “unfit” to enter the profession. Seldom does one hear the words “fun”, “creativity”, or “helping profession” applied to engineering. Engineering is perceived as the preserve of the left-brain; right-brainers need not apply.
Yet, the practice of engineering supplies enormous scope for creativity, is very often fun, and frequently requires far fewer advanced mathematics skills than most people, including engineering educators, seem to realize.
This paper will make the case for multidisciplinary team design projects as a means of encouraging students in the pursuit of engineering by demonstrating that engineering can be fun, and that creativity, initiative, resourcefulness, and people skills are as important to the success of an engineering project as are narrowly defined quantitative analytical skills. Moreover it will illustrate the value of interacting with students in other creative professions in helping engineering students to value and develop their own creativity.
A 2005 study by the National Academy of Engineering “Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century” (2005) http://www.nap.edu/books/0309096499/html/ emphasizes that for engineering schools to embrace the challenge of educating engineers needed in the twenty-first century, they must adapt their curricula and methods to emphasize
• Engagement of the engineer and professionals from different disciplines in team-based problem-solving processes; • The tools used by the engineer and other technical professionals;
Wilhelm, K., & Kidd, B., & Marshall, P. P. (2006, June), The Show Must Go On Reflections On The Pursuit Of Engineering Through Inter Disciplinary Design Challenges Paper presented at 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois. 10.18260/1-2--797
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2006 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015