June 26, 2011
June 26, 2011
June 29, 2011
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society and Engineering Ethics
22.1523.1 - 22.1523.17
The Engineer through a Multidisciplinary Lens Our work invokes multiple theoretical approaches to the question of the engineer’sperception of his/her place in the field of engineering through lenses within social psychologyand modern philosophy. We aim to help augment current conversations on and further dialogueas to what engineering is from ethnomethodological (or existential phenomenological) andsymbolic interactionism points of view. The foundation of our work is the current state ofengineering and how to address the engineer’s negotiation of his/her state of affairs. We believethis work has strong implications amidst recent publications invoking epistemologies based uponmodern philosophers, and strive to engender critical thought around some misusedmethodologies in engineering education. With the advancement of such approaches to engineering thought and philosophy, a moregrounded understanding of what engineers do and what they are should emerge along with newtools to address engineering problems. The lack of a unified engineering history of science or anengineering philosophy is evident by a dearth of core philosophical descriptions of theengineering field and a robust language to communicate such concepts. While there are treatisesthat eloquently describe the foundation of design, there is no social psychological theory ofengineering contained within a generalizable ethnomethodology or symbolic interactionismframework. Such constructs could prove invaluable not only to the engineering educationcommunity, but to the outside community as they develop a better understanding of ouremerging discipline. In this paper we will discuss what one can know and how one could knowwhat the engineer experiences from first principles in multiple disciplines, provide frameworkthat intersects ethnomethodology and symbolic interactionism for engineering perception andaction, and map these constructs to current research within engineering design and philosophy.
Ricco, G. D. (2011, June), Three Deadly Venoms: Phenomenology, Existentialism, and Philosophical Constructs to Expand Engineering Education Research Methodologies and Philosophy Paper presented at 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. https://peer.asee.org/18814
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2011 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015