Asee peer logo

Towards Developing An Ontology For K 12 Engineering Technology Education

Download Paper |

Conference

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Louisville, Kentucky

Publication Date

June 20, 2010

Start Date

June 20, 2010

End Date

June 23, 2010

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Assessment of K-12 Engineering Programs & Issues

Tagged Division

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

Page Count

8

Page Numbers

15.1270.1 - 15.1270.8

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/15666

Download Count

84

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

M. David Burghardt Hofstra University

biography

Michael Hacker Hofstra University

visit author page

Co-director, Center for Technological Literacy

visit author page

author page

Marc Devries University of Technology, Delft

author page

Ammeret Rossouw University of Technology, Delft

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Toward Developing an Ontology for K-12 Engineering Technology Education Abstract

Hofstra University’s Center for Technological Literacy and the University of Technology, Delft, conducted an international research study in the summer of 2009 to identify the most important unifying concepts and disciplinary contexts in K-12 engineering and technology education (ETE). The purpose of the study, titled Concepts and Contexts in Engineering and Technology Education (CCETE), was to provide a framework for developing contemporary ETE curricula. The study drew upon the expertise of 30 individuals from nine countries with a broad range of experience in ETE-related domains. These experts included philosophers and historians of technology, journalists, technology teacher educators, and engineering educators. A set of core unifying themes, applicable to all technological fields, emerged from this study and gave insight into the nature of engineering as a holistic endeavor. The themes are design (e.g., optimization, trade-offs, specifications), modeling (e.g., representation and prediction), systems (e.g., function, structure), resources (e.g., materials, energy, information), and human values (e.g., sustainability, innovation, risk, failure, social interaction). In addition, a set of technological contexts emerged. Situated in the belief that K-12 ETE should address issues that support a sustainable world, these contexts include food (e.g., agriculture, biotechnology), shelter (e.g., construction), water (e.g., supply and quality), energy, mobility (e.g., transportation), production, health (e.g., medical technologies), security, and communication. Further refinement indicated that when developing a curriculum, the contexts should be elaborated in two directions: a “personal concern” or “daily life practice” direction and a “global concern” direction. Introduction

One of the main issues in the development of ETE is the search for a sound conceptual basis for the curriculum in the U.S. and other countries worldwide. This search has become relevant as the nature of technology education has changed: it has gradually evolved from focusing on skills to focusing on technological literacy. Additionally, the National Academy of Engineering’s report, Engineering in K-12 Education1, examines the current status of engineering education and raises a number of issues about ETE. The lack of conceptual framework for ETE is one of those issues. It is important for students to develop an understanding of technological literacy, and this understanding implies that they have developed a realistic image of engineering and technology. We need to be explicit about what we mean by engineering and technology. Engineering is about creating the human-made world, the artifacts and processes that never existed before. This is in contrast to science, the study of the natural world. Most often engineers do not literally construct the artifacts; instead they provide plans and directions for how the artifacts are to be constructed. Both small artifacts (like a hand calculator) and large ones (like a bridge) are part of the realm of engineering. Engineers also design processes. The processes may be those used to create chemicals and drugs, to direct how components are put together on an assembly line, or to indicate how checks are to be processed in banking. Technology encompasses the way humans develop, realize, and use (and evaluate) all sorts of artifacts, systems, and processes to improve

Burghardt, M. D., & Hacker, M., & Devries, M., & Rossouw, A. (2010, June), Towards Developing An Ontology For K 12 Engineering Technology Education Paper presented at 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky. https://peer.asee.org/15666

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2010 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015