Tuition Equity: A Study of the Impact of Upper/Lower Division Tuition Rates

Nicholas A. Baine.; Karl Brakora

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Baltimore , Maryland
Publication Date: June 25, 2023
Start Date: June 25, 2023
End Date: June 28, 2023
Conference Session: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY) Technical Session 7
Tagged Divisions: Equity and Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY)
Tagged Topic: Diversity
Page Count: 13
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--44522
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/44522
Download Count: 271

Paper Authors

biography

Nicholas A. Baine. P.E. Grand Valley State University

visit author page

Nicholas Baine, Ph.D., P.E., is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering at Grand Valley State University. His expertise is in the design of electrical control systems and sensor data fusion. As an instructor, he specializes in teaching first-year courses, probability and signal modeling, and control systems. He has also been active in ASEE, serving on the board of the North Central Section, and publishing papers on a variety of topics which include ABET accreditation and first-year course design.

visit author page

biography

Karl Brakora Grand Valley State University

visit author page

Karl Brakora is an Assistant Professor in the area of electrical engineering at Grand Valley State University. He previously worked for small companies and as an independent defense contractor to develop advanced ceramic materials, radar, and novel electronic fabrication methods applied to the development of guided munitions, electro-optic imaging systems, and medical devices. At GVSU he maintains electronic prototyping courses and co-created the School of Engineering’s professional ethics curriculum, which has become his primary academic focus. Karl received his Ph.D. in Applied Electromagnetics from the University of Michigan.

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

Equality of access to college gets a lot of attention. The focuses of these efforts are often the convoluted and/or secretive admissions processes at elite schools and overall college affordability. What has not been discussed in detail is how increasingly complicated tuition and fee structures among universities are making various degrees more expensive and are also effectively resulting in charges of different tuition rates to students earning the same degree. These tuition fee structures especially impact engineering students and work against efforts to provide targeted financial aid support.

Engineering degree programs tend to require more credits (typically 5-25 more semester credits) than other programs at universities. They also tend to have little if any free elective requirements built in that allow earned credits that do not match up to specific degree requirement to be used. This is in addition to the effects of prerequisite requirements within engineering curricula. The result is that most engineering students take longer than 4 years to complete the program and have more credits (including some that are unused) when they graduate. This has an impact on the cost of the degree. Even without the increasingly popular policy to have tuition rates that differ between different programs of study, engineering degrees tend to need more credits and students take longer to complete them, thereby paying tuition for additional terms.

In the State of Michigan, it is common for universities to differentiate their tuition based on whether a student is in the upper division or lower division. While the definition of upper and lower division varies among institutions, typically a student is considered in the lower division if they have 59 or fewer earned credits (120 semester credits being the minimum for a bachelor’s degree). Since the number of credits charged at the lower division rate is capped at 59, all unused credits or additional requirements for a degree result in charges at the higher upper division rate.

This paper investigates whether this tuition structure adversely affects different groups of students. Students who change their majors and/or transfer in credits that do not satisfy graduation requirement tend to have unused or wasted credits when they graduate. Student data from University was examined to compare the distribution of credits earned by graduation for different groups of students who graduated with a degree. Comparisons are presented based on Pell Grant eligibility, gender, race, degree earned, and transfer status. These comparisons focus on the number of credits earned by the time of graduation. These comparisons are then used to show if there was a significant difference in the amount of tuition charged to the compared groups due to the higher rate charged to students in the upper division.

Citation
Format

Baine., N. A., & Brakora, K. (2023, June), Tuition Equity: A Study of the Impact of Upper/Lower Division Tuition Rates Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--44522

TY - CPAPER
AB - Equality of access to college gets a lot of attention. The focuses of these efforts are often the convoluted and/or secretive admissions processes at elite schools and overall college affordability. What has not been discussed in detail is how increasingly complicated tuition and fee structures among universities are making various degrees more expensive and are also effectively resulting in charges of different tuition rates to students earning the same degree. These tuition fee structures especially impact engineering students and work against efforts to provide targeted financial aid support.

Engineering degree programs tend to require more credits (typically 5-25 more semester credits) than other programs at universities. They also tend to have little if any free elective requirements built in that allow earned credits that do not match up to specific degree requirement to be used. This is in addition to the effects of prerequisite requirements within engineering curricula. The result is that most engineering students take longer than 4 years to complete the program and have more credits (including some that are unused) when they graduate. This has an impact on the cost of the degree. Even without the increasingly popular policy to have tuition rates that differ between different programs of study, engineering degrees tend to need more credits and students take longer to complete them, thereby paying tuition for additional terms.

In the State of Michigan, it is common for universities to differentiate their tuition based on whether a student is in the upper division or lower division. While the definition of upper and lower division varies among institutions, typically a student is considered in the lower division if they have 59 or fewer earned credits (120 semester credits being the minimum for a bachelor’s degree). Since the number of credits charged at the lower division rate is capped at 59, all unused credits or additional requirements for a degree result in charges at the higher upper division rate.

This paper investigates whether this tuition structure adversely affects different groups of students. Students who change their majors and/or transfer in credits that do not satisfy graduation requirement tend to have unused or wasted credits when they graduate. Student data from University was examined to compare the distribution of credits earned by graduation for different groups of students who graduated with a degree. Comparisons are presented based on Pell Grant eligibility, gender, race, degree earned, and transfer status. These comparisons focus on the number of credits earned by the time of graduation. These comparisons are then used to show if there was a significant difference in the amount of tuition charged to the compared groups due to the higher rate charged to students in the upper division.

AU - Nicholas A. Baine. P.E.
AU - Karl Brakora
CY - Baltimore , Maryland
DA - 2023/06/25
PB - ASEE Conferences
TI - Tuition Equity: A Study of the Impact of Upper/Lower Division Tuition Rates
UR - https://peer.asee.org/44522
DO - 10.18260/1-2--44522
ER -