June 15, 2014
June 15, 2014
June 18, 2014
24.1290.1 - 24.1290.13
Understanding how Students’ Value Behaviors in Multidisciplinary Engineering TeamsOur engineering program incorporates a strong focus on engineering design, which begins duringthe students’ sophomore year with two sequential design courses—Design I taken in the fallsemester and Design II taken during the spring semester. During this year-long sophomoredesign course sequence students work to design and construct prototypes of human-poweredvehicles for a client with cerebral palsy who lives in the local community. A client with cerebralpalsy provides not only a real, client-based design experience, but also an opportunity requiringthat the students develop a new customer persona differing from the “myself-as-the-customer”model; this process has proved challenging for many of the students. Ideally, by the end of theacademic year, students should learn the importance of disassociating themselves with thecustomer as well as understand the ethical obligations associated with being an engineer.A critical component of this sophomore project is the development of identity and communityamong a cohort of students. The sophomore design course sequence project is meant to exposethe students to an experience that transcends the classroom, and in the process, teach the studentsthat they are part of a larger complex system. Through this very-real project students, asrepresentatives of the University and the Department, see first hand how their decisions andactions as an engineer can (and likely will) influence individuals as members of society (i.e., theyare a member of a system of systems). For many students, this project is their first realization ofsocial systems and their future role as a member of a social system as a practicing engineer.This paper will provide the preliminary results of an NSF-sponsored research project to teachengineering students sustainability in five contexts – individual, social, environmental, economic,and technical. This paper focuses on the individual and social elements related to working as amember of a multidisciplinary team, and presents the results of a study on student values andbehaviors when working as a member of a multidisciplinary team. Students participating in thisstudy were asked (1) to rate their own values with respect to their membership on theirengineering team and then (2) to rate their behaviors using a survey instrument developed as apart of this research project. The survey instrument as well as the preliminary results from thefirst deployment of the survey will be presented in this paper. During this first deployment,students completed both the values survey and behaviors survey twice (once at the conclusion ofthe fall semester and again at the conclusion of the spring semester) to provide longitudinal data.Behaviors were meant to align with the values, but the students were not provided with thisalignment; rather, the students’ perceived value to behavior correlations were identified througha regression analysis. These correlations will be provided for both fall and spring semester data.The overarching goal of this portion of the study is to gain insight on student perception ofappropriate behaviors when working in a team such that course activities can be designed totarget behavioral weaknesses that can encourage students to become a functioning member of amultidisciplinary team.
Nagel, R. L., & Pappas, E. C., & Hazard, G. A., & Swain, M. (2014, June), Understanding How Students’ Value the Behaviors of Individuals in Engineering Teams Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. 10.18260/1-2--23223
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2014 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015