St. Louis, Missouri
June 18, 2000
June 18, 2000
June 21, 2000
5.680.1 - 5.680.6
Understanding Micrographs: An Educational Activity Craig Johnson Central Washington University
It is commonly accepted that there are various teaching and learning styles, and that different combinations are more effective depending on the participants and environment. Moreover, learning which involves more than listening, such as teamwork and labwork, will benefit comprehension and retention. Most materials textbooks do not have an abundance of these educational activities. This paper introduces a cooperative learning activity supporting the topic of micrographs and microstructural characterization. It takes at least half an hour, and is flexible in scope of content. It starts with a short introduction on outcomes, and then has the students discuss terminology with their neighbors. After another short discussion, the students pair off and follow a procedure for verbally describing a known microstructure, and having their partner listen and recreate it. To conclude the activity, the class has a discussion of the student’s experiences. A critical thinking question is provided as an assessment tool.
Enhancing communication and teamwork skills is an outcome stated in the Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology1, and is approached in different ways. The Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) Program at Central Washington University (CWU) has a number of course requirements addressing technical writing, presentations and speaking. However, unlike Seat and Lord2, we have no course requirement dedicated to group skills and further integration at a program level. In CWU’s MET program almost all of the courses have some in-situ laboratory work, and therefore an opportunity to build teamwork skills on an activity level.
For a number of years we have known of different teaching and learning styles, in many ways best defined by personal traits (e.g. Myers-Briggs Type Indicator3). Felder incorporated different educational methods into his chemistry courses at North Carolina State University, and eventually took his message in a workshop forum to new faculty across the country. A workshop at Washington State University4 referenced articles on topics such as student diversity5 and generating creativity6. But applying the concepts to a particular field, program and course requires a methodology that was not addressed.
In an informal survey of MET textbooks, it was found that they are not structured for intra-group learning. Two other resources proved useful is generating discrete course activities. The Center
Johnson, C. (2000, June), Understanding Micrographs: An Educational Activity Paper presented at 2000 Annual Conference, St. Louis, Missouri. 10.18260/1-2--8791
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2000 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015