New Orleans, Louisiana
June 26, 2016
June 26, 2016
August 28, 2016
Educational Research and Methods
This work in progress phenomenographic study aims to understand the variation in student learning experiences in a blended learning MOOC. Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) attract a diverse set of users with varying geographic, linguistic, social, and educational backgrounds. This diverse set of users interacts with the online platform in many different ways, and researchers have been striving to understand the various behavioral patterns of MOOC users. Most of this research is grounded in data mining and traditional statistics and does not uncover why students interact with the online learning environment the way they do. In an on-going study of a neuroscience MOOC, ABCx (identifying information removed), we previously performed initial quantitative analysis to describe the patterns of website interaction of MOOC users (references removed for blinding). This qualitative follow-up study aims to bridge the gap in previous studies and understand the different ways in which these users learn from and interact with MOOCs.
We study users who participated in the Fall 2013 offering of ABCx. As part of this course, a subset of students (185 learners) received at-home physical lab kits on which they could perform experiments using neuroscience and electrical engineering principles. The presence of physical lab kits created a type of blended learning experience for these MOOC users, as they interacted with the online learning environment and the physical lab kit. Like other MOOCs, ABCx learners also exhibit a high degree of diversity in their backgrounds and behaviors, which makes phenomenography a suitable methodology for this study. We investigate the following research questions: 1) What are student intentions and perceptions of the utility of engagement with online and offline components of this class? 2) How do students describe their learning behaviors while interacting with the online environment, and what reasoning do they give for these behaviors? 3) How are the students using the physical lab kits, and what is their realized experience interacting with the kits?
We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews via Skype with learners sampled from 42 countries using a pilot tested interview protocol. The semi-structured nature of the protocol ensured communicative validity of the study by introducing dialogue between the researcher and participant. Participants were recruited using stratified sampling based on two parameters (student final-exam grade and student level of interaction measured by number of pageviews). The interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and coded using a framework focusing on emergent themes around variation in blended user experience. To ensure anonymity, participants’ names were assigned pseudonyms, and to ensure security, audio files were stored on a secure computer. For reliability, two researchers coded and analyzed the transcripts, and the analysis was discussed amongst the research group. The coded themes were also sent to participants for member checking.
This study has key implications for STEM classes with lab components and may inform structural and pedagogical decisions for future MOOCs. Increased understanding of the rich student experiences interacting with lab kits may provide valuable insights to help MOOC designers develop effective at-home and remote lab activities, which could scale to virtual lab environments as well.
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2016 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015