Asee peer logo

Ungrading in Chemical Engineering: Attempting to Eliminate Exams, Deadlines, and Anxiety by Refocusing on Learning Instead of Grades

Download Paper |

Conference

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Baltimore , Maryland

Publication Date

June 25, 2023

Start Date

June 25, 2023

End Date

June 28, 2023

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering Division (ChED) Technical Session 7: Innovative Pedagogy

Tagged Division

Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)

Page Count

11

DOI

10.18260/1-2--44552

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/44552

Download Count

173

Paper Authors

biography

Luke Landherr Northeastern University Orcid 16x16 orcid.org/0000-0001-9805-7336

visit author page

Dr. Lucas Landherr is a teaching professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Northeastern University, conducting research in comics and engineering education.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

Modern means of assessment require approaches that consider fair and equitable means of determining students' understanding and performance. For example, students frequently connect exams to stress and anxiety, which can lead to an inability to demonstrate their mastery of the subject matter, and thus believe exams to provide inaccurate representation of their ability level. From a motivational viewpoint, centering the focus of a course on what is necessary to achieve the highest grade drives students to focus more on numerical scores as the primary description of their ability rather than on the breadth and depth of their learning. Effectively, by having student motivation focused on grade points rather than course concepts, the course outcomes become achieving a grade instead of achieving student understanding.

Ungrading provides an approach that shifts the emphasis of each course back onto learning and what students should be able to do at the end of a course. Grades are de-emphasized in exchange for greater levels of discussion and feedback focused on how well students have learned, processed, and applied the instruction in the course. There are many approaches to ungrading, such as contract grading, but the broader approach allows an instructor to provide less stressful, more equitable assessment.

In a process control course, an ungrading method was applied that eliminated exams and most deadlines in the course. Students were provided a number of optional problems and exercises that could be conducted that aligned with each of the course outcomes. Exercises could be submitted for feedback throughout the semester, allowing students to correct their work and assemble a completed portfolio of work demonstrating their mastery over the course outcomes at the end of the semester. In process control, course outcomes could be completed by work on a semester-long course project, while other exercises were simply homework and exam problems from previous iterations of the course restructured to allow students to process their understanding and better apply their skills for a more considered performance of understanding.

Students completed a number of self-assessment assignments throughout the semester, and a final grade was determined for each student in discussion with the instructor based on a reasoned consideration of their efforts and completed correct work.

This paper will discuss these ungrading efforts in the course, student feedback throughout the semester, and recommendations for other instructors interested in applying an ungrading approach in their courses.

Landherr, L. (2023, June), Ungrading in Chemical Engineering: Attempting to Eliminate Exams, Deadlines, and Anxiety by Refocusing on Learning Instead of Grades Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--44552

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2023 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015