Virtual On line
June 22, 2020
June 22, 2020
June 26, 2021
Women in Engineering
When you ask women how they became interested in engineering as a career path, they typically launch into an origin story, perhaps detailing their childhood hobbies, educational achievements, or mentors who encouraged them. The narrative often seems well-practiced, as if it has been honed to include only the most important information and sharpened through repeated tellings. In my ethnographic fieldwork with women engineers, I began to associate these stories with the “elevator pitch” genre, in which the narrative is condensed to provide the maximum impact in the shortest amount of time. Faulkner (2009) observed in her fieldwork that women’s origin stories are well-rehearsed in ways that men’s are not, indicating women’s obligation to justify their existence in the male-dominated world of engineering. These narratives are opportunities for women to define their own identities as engineers, and to simultaneously reshape the listener’s perception of what makes a “good” engineer. This paper draws upon narratives collected during 15 months of field work in the Northeastern US (2018–2019), including 50+ life history interviews. The “elevator pitch” was a frequent occurrence, unprompted, usually at the beginning of the interview, and the participant and I would develop the life history in more detail throughout the rest of the interview. I use narrative analysis to identify core components and strategic variations of these origin stories, highlighting what these components and variations do in terms of defining women’s engineering identities. Using the more detailed life history content, I note the components of participants’ experiences that have been trimmed out of the “elevator pitch”. I also compare the narratives of women born in the US with women who were born in India and China. I find that engineers who immigrated to the U.S. are not always familiar with this particular story-telling style, which can limit their persuasiveness in the workplace. In addition, Asian women struggle to explain their histories to an American audience, placing them at a disadvantage in shaping how they are perceived by their colleagues. Small sample sizes and regional specificity limit the generalizability of these findings; however, these narrative accounts provide important context related to how women perceive their position in the male-dominated field of engineering and their efforts to situate themselves as full members within it.
Appelhans, S. (2020, June), Unpacking the Elevator Pitch: Women’s Narratives in Engineering Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line . 10.18260/1-2--35434
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2020 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015