Asee peer logo

Usability, Library Research Guides, and the Engineering Student

Download Paper |

Conference

2017 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Location

Tempe, Arizona

Publication Date

April 20, 2017

Start Date

April 20, 2017

End Date

April 22, 2017

Conference Session

Technical Session 2a

Tagged Topic

Pacific Southwest Section

Page Count

16

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/29240

Download Count

26

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Sheree Fu California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

visit author page

Sheree Fu is the engineering librarian at California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo.

visit author page

biography

Andrew Kleve California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

visit author page

Senior, BS Aerospace Engineering

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

Engineering students must be able to locate relevant, credible, and high-quality information. However, many students motivated by familiarity, simplicity, and speed typically turn to Google for their research needs, leaving their library’s webpages underused. Library-created resources offer a plethora of credible, current information but can be overwhelming, confusing, and difficult for students to navigate. To address this issue, librarians have turned to usability testing of research guides to make them more intuitive and usable. Usability testing involves gathering direct feedback from users as they complete tasks. Such audience feedback enables librarians to make cleaner, more user friendly library research guides. The authors of this paper observed aerospace engineering students at California State Polytechnic University at San Luis Obsipo (Cal Poly) interacting with an online subject research guide as they performed research tasks during two rounds of usability testing. In the first round of tests, participants were encouraged to think aloud and share their experiences with the facilitator. Students unanimously found the navigation somewhat muddled. The authors surmised that the visual clutter on the guide contributed to an unsatisfying user experience. Although the guides were difficult to use, students persisted. Students were willing to make numerous clicks in an effort to discover library resources to complete the usability test. In spite of the guide’s design issues, the results indicated that participants found value as they explored the research guide. The authors then modified certain elements of the research guide based on the test results and participants completed a second round of usability testing. The authors recommend ongoing testing to improve the information architecture (i.e., labeling and organization of content) of research guides. In this article, they explore how to apply their usability findings to other research guides and library resources. Their insights into students’ information-seeking behaviors and mental models may benefit other online and engineering educators.

Fu, S., & Kleve, A. (2017, April), Usability, Library Research Guides, and the Engineering Student Paper presented at 2017 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting, Tempe, Arizona. https://peer.asee.org/29240

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2017 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015