Watt, A., & Bernal, A., & Kirkpatrick, S. (2016, June), Usability Testing: Influencing Design Decisions and Improving Documentation  Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.27110

\bibitem{asee_peer_27110}
  Watt, A., \& Bernal, A., \& Kirkpatrick, S. (2016, June), \emph{Usability Testing: Influencing Design Decisions and Improving Documentation}
  Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana.
  10.18260/p.27110

Anneliese Watt, Ashley Bernal, and Scott Kirkpatrick.  "Usability Testing: Influencing Design Decisions and Improving Documentation".  2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016, June.  ASEE Conferences, 2016.  https://peer.asee.org/27110 Internet.  29 Jun, 2024

\bibitem{asee_peer_27110}
  Anneliese Watt, Ashley Bernal, and Scott Kirkpatrick.
  "Usability Testing: Influencing Design Decisions and Improving Documentation".
  \emph{2016 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016, June}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2016.
  https://peer.asee.org/27110 Internet.  29 Jun, 2024

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_27110
author = "Anneliese Watt, Ashley Bernal, and Scott Kirkpatrick"
title = "Usability Testing: Influencing Design Decisions and Improving Documentation"
booktitle = "2016 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition"
year = "2016"
month = "June"
address = "New Orleans, Louisiana"
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://peer.asee.org/27110}
number = {10.18260/p.27110}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - Instruction-writing is a genre of engineering communication frequently taught in both technical writing classrooms and engineering design classes, as students might, for example, be asked to write a manual documenting how to assemble, operate, or maintain the objects or equipment they have designed.  The benefits of user testing of instructions are well established in both professional practice and academic literature.  In the technical communication classroom, the pedagogy of usability emphasizes having test subjects (as representative of target users as possible) use a draft of the instructions to complete the desired action, in the process exposing flaws in the text of the instructions: areas of ambiguity, lack of clarity, need for visuals, organizational problems, and the like.  The instructions are then revised based on user feedback.  The authors of this paper (professors of technical communication, physics and optical engineering, and mechanical engineering) have created and teach a multi-disciplinary course inspired by the NAE’s Grand Challenges for Engineering, in which the students design, build, and document a technology meant to address one or more of the challenges in a particular location (for example, harness solar energy economically to build infrastructure in Haiti). This is a full-time, 12-credit hour summer program, and this summer we added usability testing to the design and documentation process.  Instead of just testing their design, students also tested their user documentation.  The professors served as test subjects (we’ll discuss the pros and cons of this), and many problems with the intended process and documentation were exposed.  Students then revised not only the instructions they had written for their intended users, but also details of the design itself and its method of deployment.  This integrated testing and revision process was a source of satisfaction for the instructors beyond that found in the stand-alone technical communication or engineering design classroom.
AU  - Anneliese Watt
AU  - Ashley Bernal
AU  - Scott Kirkpatrick
CY  - New Orleans, Louisiana
DA  - 2016/06/26
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Usability Testing: Influencing Design Decisions and Improving Documentation
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/27110
DO  - 10.18260/p.27110
ER  -