Asee peer logo

Use Of Quality Function Deployment For Outcomes Assessment In Meeting Abet 2000 Requirements

Download Paper |

Conference

2000 Annual Conference

Location

St. Louis, Missouri

Publication Date

June 18, 2000

Start Date

June 18, 2000

End Date

June 21, 2000

ISSN

2153-5965

Page Count

16

Page Numbers

5.685.1 - 5.685.16

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/8803

Download Count

41

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Phillip R. Rosenkrantz

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Session 2557

Case Study: Using Quality Function Deployment to Meet ABET 2000 Requirements for Outcomes Assessment

Phillip R. Rosenkrantz California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

I. Introduction

During the 1997-98 Academic Year the Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering Department Faculty formed an ABET Outcomes and Assessment Team to address issues related to program objectives, outcomes, and assessment in preparation for our accreditation visit scheduled for Fall 1999. The following options for approaching the ABET 2000 criteria and process were considered:

Strategic Planning – Classical strategic planning is not far off from being a model that could be used for outcomes assessment. Kaufman, in his book Educational Planning: Strategic, Tactical, and Operational, proposes “mega-strategic planning” for educational institutions1. In this framework constituencies are asked to help define specific “skill, knowledge, attitude, and ability requirements” (called SKAA’s) which drive sequencing and curriculum requirements.

Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Criteria – The MBNQA criteria has been adapted for educational institutions and could be adapted and used for educational assessment and planning. Core values in the MBNQA process are very compatible with outcomes assessment The advantage of the adopting this methodology is the future potential for external auditor assessment and comparing to best practices of other institutions.

Total Quality Management (TQM) - In 1992 the IME Department used a combinations of several of the tools to develop a new manufacturing engineering curriculum. “Voice of the customer” from QFD, affinity diagrams, and interrelationship charts were used with excellent results2. Kaufman also proposes a more comprehensive approach to TQM for educational planners called QM+1.

Quality Function Deployment (QFD) – QFD is an excellent, efficient approach for identifying the “voice of the customer” and designing an efficient system around their requirements. QFD has been widely adapted ever since for use in government, education, and the non-profit sector at large. The originator of QFD, Prof. Yoji Akao, has even proposed some developments along these lines3.

Rosenkrantz, P. R. (2000, June), Use Of Quality Function Deployment For Outcomes Assessment In Meeting Abet 2000 Requirements Paper presented at 2000 Annual Conference, St. Louis, Missouri. https://peer.asee.org/8803

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2000 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015