Asee peer logo

Use of Student Self-Evaluations to Reinforce the Project Control Cycle

Download Paper |

Conference

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Seattle, Washington

Publication Date

June 14, 2015

Start Date

June 14, 2015

End Date

June 17, 2015

ISBN

978-0-692-50180-1

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Construction Project Delivery and Control

Tagged Division

Construction

Page Count

10

Page Numbers

26.1644.1 - 26.1644.10

DOI

10.18260/p.24981

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/24981

Download Count

472

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

MaryEllen C. Nobe Colorado State University

visit author page

Dr. MaryEllen C. Nobe is an Assistant Professor at Colorado State University. Her primary areas of research are construction education, human dimensions of construction management, and sustainable construction.

visit author page

biography

Rodolfo Valdes-Vasquez Colorado State University

visit author page

Rodolfo Valdes-Vasquez is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Construction Management at Colorado State University. He is committed to advancing research and teaching in the sustainability of infrastructure projects. He believes that educating the next generation of professionals will play a pivotal role in making sustainability a standard practice.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

Use of Student Self Evaluations to Reinforce the Project Control CycleThe project control cycle has seven basic steps: (1) develop project plan, (2) establishbenchmarks, (3) monitor project performance, (4) identify deviation, (5) evaluate correctiveoptions, (6) make adjustment, and (7) document, report and evaluate (Jackson, 2010). Whenattempting to teach this project control cycle, the importance of ‘evaluate’ is difficult to conveyto students. This paper represents a qualitative case study conducted with freshman studentsenrolled in CON 101: Introduction to Construction Management on how to convey theimportance of evaluating project performance – regardless if the project was a success or not.The purpose of this course is to provide students with a fundamental understanding of theconstruction industry including: different industry sectors, different career paths, and thefundamental skills need to design, estimate, plan, and build a construction project. The projectcontrol cycle is taught as part of ‘building a construction project’ under the subheading‘monitoring project performance’. As stated in the literature, the hardest step of the projectcontrol cycle to implement is the last step of document, report and evaluate. Of these, theevaluation portion is even more difficult for a team to accomplish. One of the reason for thisdifficulty is that members of the construction management team are often burnt out with respectto the project they have just finished and are eager to start on a new project. In order to instill instudents early in their degree program the importance of evaluation both to constructionmanagement and to their individual success, a case study was developed and implemented withstudents enrolled in CON 101.Throughout the course, analogies were made between the successful management of aconstruction project and an individual student’s successful completion of their constructionmanagement degree. For example, one of the determinants of success for a construction projectis how well the resources available to build the project (e.g. money, labor, materials, equipment,and subs) are managed. With respect to a student’s degree, their success is also dependent onresource utilization. For example, they have limited funds to cover their schooling expenses andliving expenses. They have limited time for work, classes, studying, and socializing. At the endof the semester, students were asked to evaluate their semester. This paper presents the lessonslearned by students during their personal evaluation phase.Evaluating is to identify and share information about what worked and what didn’t work duringthe project (Jackson, 2010). In the context of CON 101, students were asked to treat theirsemester of courses as a project that they would evaluate. Each student wrote a 1-2 page papersummarizing their evaluation. In total 47 students completed the assignment. Thematic analysiswas conducted on the students’ papers. The emerging themes from these evaluations will bepresented in this paper. This information will provide insight into students’ overall evaluation oftheir success during their first semester – which is a critical semester in students’ college careers.

Nobe, M. C., & Valdes-Vasquez, R. (2015, June), Use of Student Self-Evaluations to Reinforce the Project Control Cycle Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.24981

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2015 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015