July 26, 2021
July 26, 2021
July 19, 2022
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
The development of a skilled and robust U.S. engineering workforce is more crucial than ever as social, environmental, and health crises unravel on a national and global stage. Yet, productivity and retention remain prominent concerns for the engineering profession. Some reports have addressed these issues by focusing on the persistence of “skills and knowledge gaps,” noting how engineers’ preparation falls short on central aspects of professional practice such as teamwork, communication, and information-seeking. While these studies suggest that enhancing engineers’ technical and professional competencies can increase their self-reliance, thereby increasing their job performance and satisfaction, accounts of under-preparedness nevertheless continue to surface.
Emerging research by the current author team and others suggests that gaps in what engineers know and can do are not the sole sources of confusion as they transition from students to professionals, and person-organizational value congruence is likely just as important in shaping engineers’ experiences within their organizations. Recent prominent examples of value incongruence between corporate leadership and employees in engineering have occurred at Amazon over warehouse safety, Facebook over its relationship with free speech, and Google over sexual harassment claims. Employees voluntarily walked out, resigned, or unionized in these cases. Yet, literature suggests that both major and minor instances of value incongruence play out in the engineering workplace often, in myriad ways. Furthermore, literature from organizational psychology demonstrates that value incongruence can be detrimental to both organizations and individuals, resulting in losses in productivity, innovation, engagement, satisfaction, and retention.
This position paper considers the values constructed and reified within engineering education and compares them to those encountered in the engineering workforce. Specifically, we critically revisit the findings from three of our own, previously published studies about practicing engineers, applying the lens of “values gaps” to explore their professional experiences and the tensions that occur in new light. Our central thesis is that interventions to improve engineers’ preparation for the workforce will be sufficient only when scholars also consider the differences in values between individuals and their employers. Whereas it might not be possible or practical to completely eliminate the gaps in engineers’ skills noted by the literature, a focus on values could better position engineers to successfully transition from school to work, authentically find their own path within engineering, and meaningfully contribute to engineering organizations and society. Illustrations and implications of this phenomenon will be discussed in the full paper.
Brunhaver, S. R., & Lutz, B. D., & Canney, N. E. (2021, July), Using a Values Lens to Examine Engineers' Workplace Experiences Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. https://peer.asee.org/37984
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2021 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015