Using Design for Six Sigma Practices to Develop a “Rose” Belt Course

Craig G. Downing

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Vancouver, BC
Publication Date: June 26, 2011
Start Date: June 26, 2011
End Date: June 29, 2011
ISSN: 2153-5965
Conference Session: Tools of the Trade
Tagged Division: Engineering Management
Page Count: 11
Page Numbers: 22.1611.1 - 22.1611.11
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--18611
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/18611
Download Count: 626

Paper Authors

biography

Craig G. Downing Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

visit author page

Craig G. Downing became the Interim Department Head of Engineering Management at Rose-Hulman of Institute of Technology, as of July 2010. Prior to that, his teachings assignments focused on delivering graduate-level instruction in the Operational and Quality aspects of Engineering Management. Dr. Downing has over 15 years of experience providing instruction in the areas of Manufacturing, Management, and Mathematics at the post-secondary level. Additionally, he has amassed 12 years of industrial experience, four years as a Process Engineer and eight years as a private consultant and researcher. His interests are rooted in Industrial-Academic relationships, Quality Management System Development, and Production/Operations Management. He is a certified Six Sigma Black Belt.

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

Using Design for Six Sigma Practices to Develop a “Rose” Belt Course Craig G Downing Rose‐Hulman Institute of Technology Abstract Due to the well‐documented benefits of Six Sigma methodologies in many successful and competitive organizations, the adoption of Six Sigma continues to expand within and outside of traditional manufacturing and service organizations. As such, the Engineering Management department of Rose‐Hulman Institute of Technology (RHIT) set out to develop a 10‐week Rose Belt course. The class will provide students with fundamental knowledge, quality tools, and practical experience using the DMAIC (Define‐Measure‐Analyze‐Improve‐Control) process. The intent of the course is not to supplant other forms of certification (white, yellow, green, or black belt). Rather, the goal is to use a project‐based approach so that students gain valuable insight into the organizational (operational) improvement process, as well as experience using Six Sigma tools (qualitative and quantitative). It is the author’s belief that these experiences will reduce the amount of time required by students/graduates to begin engaging in “live” Six Sigma projects upon completion of the course. In the absence of a universally accepted or practiced body of knowledge, the DMADV (Define‐Measure‐Analyze‐Design‐Verify) methodology was used to design the course. Previous uses of similar industry‐focused quality management tools, such as Quality Function Deployment (QFD), have been used to redesign engineering education curriculum with notable success. Our objective was to correctly identify and assess the technical concepts and non‐technical skills industrial practitioners most frequently encountered when leading or participating in successful Six Sigma projects. This information will serve as the critical‐to‐quality (CTQ) components of the curricula. In addition to using credible process redesign techniques, input was gathered from a comprehensive representation of industries ranging from automotive to telecommunication and bio‐pharmaceutical to transportation (logistics). The diversification of respondents enhanced the survey results and face‐to‐face interviews. Data captured reflected organizational leadership from the “shop‐floor” to the “top‐floor.” The common thread among all respondents was that they represent organizations and individuals who have successfully implemented or participated in Six Sigma initiatives. More importantly, their efforts have driven positive cultural change and creation of effective business processes resulting in innovative solutions to eradicate inefficiencies in their operations. As such, the balance of this paper will outline the work in progress by the author and the effort to utilize Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) methodologies to design a graduate‐level course that reflects Rose‐Hulman’s tradition of academic excellence and industrial relevance.

Citation
Format

Downing, C. G. (2011, June), Using Design for Six Sigma Practices to Develop a “Rose” Belt Course Paper presented at 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. 10.18260/1-2--18611

TY  - CPAPER
AB  -                  Using Design for Six Sigma Practices to Develop a “Rose” Belt Course                                            Craig G Downing                                 Rose‐Hulman Institute of Technology  Abstract Due to the well‐documented benefits of Six Sigma methodologies in many successful and competitive organizations, the adoption of Six Sigma continues to expand within and outside of traditional manufacturing and service organizations.  As such, the Engineering Management department of Rose‐Hulman Institute of Technology (RHIT) set out to develop a 10‐week Rose Belt course.  The class will provide students with fundamental knowledge, quality tools, and practical experience using the DMAIC (Define‐Measure‐Analyze‐Improve‐Control) process.  The intent of the course is not to supplant other forms of certification (white, yellow, green, or black belt).  Rather, the goal is to use a project‐based approach so that students gain valuable insight into the organizational (operational) improvement process, as well as experience using Six Sigma tools (qualitative and quantitative). It is the author’s belief that these experiences will reduce the amount of time required by students/graduates to begin engaging in “live” Six Sigma projects upon completion of the course.  In the absence of a universally accepted or practiced body of knowledge, the DMADV (Define‐Measure‐Analyze‐Design‐Verify) methodology was used to design the course.  Previous uses of similar industry‐focused quality management tools, such as Quality Function Deployment (QFD), have been used to redesign engineering education curriculum with notable success.   Our objective was to correctly identify and assess the technical concepts and non‐technical skills industrial practitioners most frequently encountered when leading or participating in successful Six Sigma projects.  This information will serve as the critical‐to‐quality (CTQ) components of the curricula. In addition to using credible process redesign techniques, input was gathered from a comprehensive representation of industries ranging from automotive to telecommunication and bio‐pharmaceutical to transportation (logistics).  The diversification of respondents enhanced the survey results and face‐to‐face interviews.  Data captured reflected organizational leadership from the “shop‐floor” to the “top‐floor.” The common thread among all respondents was that they represent organizations and individuals who have successfully implemented or participated in Six Sigma initiatives.  More importantly, their efforts have driven positive cultural change and creation of effective business processes resulting in innovative solutions to eradicate inefficiencies in their operations.  As such, the balance of this paper will outline the work in progress by the author and the effort to utilize Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) methodologies to design a graduate‐level course that reflects Rose‐Hulman’s tradition of academic excellence and industrial relevance.  
AU  - Craig G. Downing
CY  - Vancouver, BC
DA  - 2011/06/26
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Using Design for Six Sigma Practices to Develop a “Rose” Belt Course
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/18611
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--18611
ER  -