Asee peer logo

Using Grant Transition Periods to Improve Program Evaluation & Offerings; Case Study: Washington Space Grant

Download Paper |

Conference

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Location

San Antonio, Texas

Publication Date

February 9, 2025

Start Date

February 9, 2025

End Date

February 11, 2025

Conference Session

Track 7: Technical Session 6: Using Grant Transition Periods to Improve Program Evaluation & Offerings; Case Study: Washington Space Grant

Tagged Topics

Diversity and 2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions

Page Count

24

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/54125

Download Count

4

Paper Authors

biography

Elizabeth Litzler University of Washington Orcid 16x16 orcid.org/0000-0003-0626-8473

visit author page

Elizabeth Litzler, Ph.D., is the Director of the University of Washington Center for Evaluation and Research for STEM Equity (UW CERSE) and an affiliate assistant professor of sociology. She has been at UW working on STEM Equity issues for 21 years.

visit author page

biography

Rae Jing Han University of Washington Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity

visit author page

Dr. Rae Jing Han (they/them) is a Research Scientist at the University of Washington Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity.

visit author page

biography

Erin Carll University of Washington

visit author page

Erin Carll is the associate director at the University of Washington Center for Evaluation and Research for STEM Equity (CERSE). Her evaluation and research focus on efforts to expand equity and inclusion in the STEM fields, including through community building and leveraging existing assets. She currently serves on the Women in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN) Board of Directors and the Society for Women Engineers Research Advisory Council. Erin has published research in the fields of engineering education, housing, neighborhoods, and the carceral system. She earned a PhD and MA in sociology as well as a certificate in demographic methods and a concentration in social statistics from the University of Washington. Erin also holds an MA and BA in Russian and Eastern European studies, and an AA in liberal arts and sciences.

visit author page

author page

Kam H Yee University of Washington

author page

Brenda N Martinez University of Washington

Download Paper |

Abstract

Sometimes projects settle into a status quo of doing the same things because that is what has always been done. In this presentation, we’ll talk about the process of transitioning a NASA-funded [State] Space Grant to develop more meaningful activities/interventions for students and to improve the evaluation of the project. The project is writing a renewal grant now and has been collaborating with an evaluator to refine the planned activities and the SMART goals and planned measurement of the outcomes of those activities.

The project supports students pursuing careers in STEM, helps develop faculty skills/knowledge and supports some pre-college education activities. The new grant has an increased focus on broadening participation and has a new requirement for external evaluation. Historically, 50% of student funding is awarded to marginalized students in STEM. Starting in 2024 the program began to increase the percentage of marginalized student recipients and alongside funding will incorporate cohort programs that honor students’ cultural, racial, and ethnic identities. The presentation will discuss the motivations for the changes as well as some of the outcomes from prior work.

The [State] Space Grant recently engaged a new evaluator on the project to help write the new proposal and to develop a strong evaluation plan for the renewal grant. This opportunity has led to additional discussion about what goals and outcomes the project is trying to achieve, and has sharpened the project’s articulation of how the project’s activities are connected to those outcomes. For example, the new grant includes a focus on building strong, reciprocal relationships with affiliate institutions to support the partners to move toward specific learning objectives that are relevant and sustaining for the students in their programs. The presentation will discuss how projects working towards continued funding/renewal funding can think about framing their work and their changes to ensure that meaningful outcomes are captured in the evaluation.

Litzler, E., & Han, R. J., & Carll, E., & Yee, K. H., & Martinez, B. N. (2025, February), Using Grant Transition Periods to Improve Program Evaluation & Offerings; Case Study: Washington Space Grant Paper presented at 2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD), San Antonio, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/54125

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2025 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015