Asee peer logo

Using Peer Review in a Freshman Engineering Graphics Course to Enhance Understanding of Basic Dimensioning Techniques

Download Paper |

Conference

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Seattle, Washington

Publication Date

June 14, 2015

Start Date

June 14, 2015

End Date

June 17, 2015

ISBN

978-0-692-50180-1

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Topics Related To Engineering Design Graphics Division

Tagged Division

Engineering Design Graphics

Page Count

11

Page Numbers

26.1674.1 - 26.1674.11

DOI

10.18260/p.25010

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/25010

Download Count

104

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Nancy E. Study Pennsylvania State University, Erie

visit author page

Nancy E. Study is on the faculty of the School of Engineering at Penn State Erie - The Behrend College where she teaches courses in engineering graphics and rapid prototyping, and is the coordinator of the rapid prototyping lab. Her research interests include visualization and haptics. She is a former chair of the ASEE Engineering Design Graphics Division and is currently the Circulation Manager and Treasurer of the Engineering Design Graphics Journal.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

Using Peer Review in a Freshman Engineering Graphics Course to Enhance Understanding of Basic Dimensioning TechniquesAppropriate application of basic dimensioning techniques is a topic that students enrolled in anintroductory engineering graphics course have problems with on an ongoing basis. Errors thatoccur regularly on assignments and exams, despite instruction, assignments, and required readingon the topic, include poor placement, missing dimensions, over dimensioning, and incorrectformatting.In an attempt to improve students’ dimensioning techniques and reinforce the importance ofbeing able to read drawings that others have created, peer review of select assignments will beintroduced into the course during the fall 2014 semester. Currently, drawings are graded solelyby the instructor and returned to the students with feedback. General comments are made to theclass at large on what students are typically getting correct and incorrect on the assignments, andoccasionally individual students will ask for more detailed feedback on their work but this is theexception more than the rule.As part of the new peer assessment plan, students will turn a print of the multiview drawing in tothe instructor at the beginning of lab then the assignments will be shuffled and randomly handedback to students so they will not be grading their own work. A copy of the correctly dimensioneddrawing will be projected on the screen in front of the class and on the students’ computermonitors. They will be allowed a limited amount of time and required to analyze the drawingthey have been given, mark any errors they find, and ask questions. Students will letter theirname on the drawing to indicate they are the person who marked it up. Part of each student’sgrade on the assignment will be determined by how well they marked up the drawing they weregiven.Grades on the individual assignments will be compared to those from previous semesters to seeif there is an improvement in the student work on the dimensioning assignments after the peerreview has been implemented. Grades on exams and quizzes that have content related todimensioning will also be compared to see if there was an overall improvement in students’dimensioning techniques.

Study, N. E. (2015, June), Using Peer Review in a Freshman Engineering Graphics Course to Enhance Understanding of Basic Dimensioning Techniques Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.25010

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2015 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015