Asee peer logo

Using Qualitative Data to Further Examine Flagged Items from the Engineering Ethics Reasoning Instrument (EERI)

Download Paper |

Conference

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Location

Virtual On line

Publication Date

June 22, 2020

Start Date

June 22, 2020

End Date

June 26, 2021

Conference Session

Assessing Ethics Learning

Tagged Division

Engineering Ethics

Page Count

14

DOI

10.18260/1-2--35469

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/35469

Download Count

13

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Peter Wesley Odom Purdue University, West Lafayette

visit author page

Wesley is a PhD student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His primary research interests surround assessment technologies, the psychology of student learning of STEM subjects, and international community development.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

Given the relative popularity of the Engineering Ethics Reasoning Instrument (EERI), despite only being in the early stages of validation, it is important to make progress towards ensuring that it is reliable and measuring what it is intended to measure. The EERI has been referenced or used for research in more than ten ASEE papers since 2014 and was even used as a component of research published in the Journal of Engineering Education (JEE) last year. Results from a recent Partial Confirmatory Factor Analysis (PCFA) of the EERI indicated that 17 of the 72 items in the EERI were not loading strongly enough with their schemas or were loading incorrectly. This paper explores qualitative results from a special administration of the EERI where students were asked to provide additional information about how they perceived items from the instrument. The students were prompted to do individual reflections as well as teamed reflections where they discussed differences of opinion regarding various items. Afterwards they returned to answer some follow up qualitative and quantitative questions. This paper takes this data and investigates if there are any connections between what students reported and the 17 items which were identified as problematic during the PCFA. Results from the qualitative data supported several of the outcomes from the PCFA while providing fewer insights regarding other items. Overall, it is believed that results highlighted several previously unknown issues with certain items from the EERI. Fortunately, the results also provide evidence-based support for how the indicated items may need to be updated, or justification for their removal.

Odom, P. W. (2020, June), Using Qualitative Data to Further Examine Flagged Items from the Engineering Ethics Reasoning Instrument (EERI) Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line . 10.18260/1-2--35469

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2020 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015