Asee peer logo

Using Students-Generated Concept Maps to Assess Students’ Conceptual Understanding in a Foundational Engineering Course

Download Paper |

Conference

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Seattle, Washington

Publication Date

June 14, 2015

Start Date

June 14, 2015

End Date

June 17, 2015

ISBN

978-0-692-50180-1

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Tagged Topic

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Page Count

9

Page Numbers

26.1684.1 - 26.1684.9

DOI

10.18260/p.25020

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/25020

Download Count

118

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Ning Fang Utah State University

visit author page

Ning Fang is a Professor in the College of Engineering at Utah State University, USA. He has taught a variety of courses at both graduate and undergraduate levels, such as engineering dynamics, metal machining, and design for manufacturing. His areas of interest include computer-assisted instructional technology, curricular reform in engineering education, the modeling and optimization of manufacturing processes, and lean product design. He earned his PhD, MS, and BS degrees in mechanical engineering and is the author of more than 60 technical papers published in refereed international journals and conference proceedings. He is a Senior Member of the Society for Manufacturing Engineering, a member of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, and a member of the American Society for Engineering Education.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

Using Students-Generated Concept Maps to Assess Students’ Conceptual Understanding in a Foundational Engineering CourseThis paper reports the results of an engineering education project funded by the NSF TUES-Type1 program. One primary goal of the project is to improve student conceptual understanding andcomprehension in a foundational yet difficult undergraduate engineering course – EngineeringDynamics (ED).Nearly all students in mechanical, aerospace, civil, biological, and biomedical engineeringprograms are required to take this course. The course covers a broad spectrum of foundationalconcepts, such as displacement, velocity, acceleration, force, work, energy, impulse, momentum,and vibration. Nonetheless, ED is widely regarded as one of the most difficult courses tosucceed in. In a recent survey, students were asked about their perspectives about ED. Morethan 60% of the students surveyed used phrases, such as “much harder than Statics,” “extremelydifficult,” “very challenging,” and “are afraid of it.” Students often drop out of engineeringbecause they fail this course – the last pre-professional gateway course before entering aprofessional engineering program.Research has shown that conceptual understanding plays a critical role in students’ problem-solving performance. Assessing conceptual understanding is important in order to design themost appropriate pedagogy to improve students’ problem-solving performance. Theconventional way to assess conceptual understanding is to conduct assessment tests (such as theConcept Inventory Test) and/or interviews. In this study, conceptual understanding wereassessed through students-generated concept maps. Guided by active learning andconstructivism theories, students developed their own concept maps after they had learned anengineering dynamics theme (i.e., a chapter in a dynamics textbook). Students-generatedconcept maps were closely examined. This paper presents representative concept mapsgenerated by students who took dynamics in a recent semester. The results show that students-generated concept maps provide a significant amount of information on their understandingand/or misunderstandings of relevant concepts and can be used as a supplemental tool to assessconceptual understanding in this foundational engineering course.

Fang, N. (2015, June), Using Students-Generated Concept Maps to Assess Students’ Conceptual Understanding in a Foundational Engineering Course Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.25020

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2015 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015