Asee peer logo

Using Studios as a Strategy to Respond to Increasing Enrollment

Download Paper |

Conference

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

San Antonio, Texas

Publication Date

June 10, 2012

Start Date

June 10, 2012

End Date

June 13, 2012

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

New Classrooms, New Challenges II: Assessing Non-traditional Approaches

Tagged Division

Chemical Engineering

Page Count

22

Page Numbers

25.1443.1 - 25.1443.22

DOI

10.18260/1-2--22200

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/22200

Download Count

487

Paper Authors

biography

Milo Koretsky Oregon State University

visit author page

Milo Koretsky is a professor of chemical engineering at Oregon State University. He currently has research activity in areas related to thin film materials processing and engineering education. He is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. Koretsky is a six-time Intel Faculty Fellow and has won awards for his work in engineering education at the university and national levels.

visit author page

author page

Kenneth J. Williamson Oregon State University

biography

Jeffrey A. Nason Oregon State University

visit author page

Jeff Nason is an Assistant Professor of environmental engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests are in the area of physical/chemical treatment of water, with a focus on particle removal processes. He is also interested in developing effective techniques for implementing active learning activities in high-enrollment engineering courses.

visit author page

author page

Goran Jovanovic Ph.D. Oregon State University

biography

Chih-hung Chang Oregon State University

visit author page

Chih-hung (Alex) Chang is a professor of chemical engineering at Oregon State University. He is a SHARP Labs of America Scholar, and a recipient of Intel Faculty Fellowship, AVS Graduate Research award, National Science Foundation’s CAREER Award, and awardee of W.M. Keck Foundation. His group has studied solution-based thin film deposition processes, ink jet printing, microreaction technology, and x-ray absorption fine structure.

visit author page

author page

Adam Z. Higgins Oregon State University

author page

Craig M. Gates Oregon State University

author page

Richard Mark Roehner Oregon State University

Download Paper |

Abstract

Using Studios as a Strategy to Respond to Increasing EnrollmentRecently chemical engineering programs in many universities have shown significant growthrelated to student interest in energy production, sustainability, and innovation chemicalprocessing. With the increasing student populations, many programs have struggled with servinglarger number of students while maintaining an effective learning environment. One approachhas been to limit enrollment and another has been to deliver the same class multiple times. Thispaper reports an alternative approach in which larger lecture classes are punctuated by smallerstudios. In the studios, students are afforded the opportunity to actively engage the contentpresented in lecture. This paper presents a comprehensive implementation of the studio approachthat comprises of the incorporation of studios in nine classes during the 2011-2012 academicyear at XXX University.We present key elements of the design and implementation of studios. They are activity based(e.g., students solving problems, explaining phenomena from in class demonstrations, answeringconceptual questions, working on virtual laboratories, etc.). The enrollment in a single studio islimited typically to about 25 students to achieve an instructional model of facilitating learningand rapid feedback.The implementation is executed by a coordinated team effort. Each class has a professor, aninstructor who serves as studio coordinator, and graduate student teaching assistants. A trainingprogram was used to prepare the graduate students for their role. In addition, there are regularmeetings between the entire team and other meetings between those in a given class. Thesemeetings contain a broad array of topics, including studio design and delivery, effectiveness andassessment, and uniform delivery, formatting, and grading. The intent is to align the design anddelivery amongst classes and between classes. In this way, we hope to create a consistentexpectation among students in a studio, lowering the cognitive demand of different formats andallowing strong student focus. Such alignment also allows more coordinated and effectivegraduate student training including introduction to teaching effectiveness in higher education.In the paper, we will provide description, analysis, and student perception of the first quarter ofthe widespread studio implementation in three classes: material balances, thermodynamics andfluid mechanics. We will also comment on the administrative support and department cultureneeded for this type of curricular innovation.This work could either fit in a regular session or, with the appropriate other papers, in a"discussion" session.

Koretsky, M., & Williamson, K. J., & Nason, J. A., & Jovanovic, G., & Chang, C., & Higgins, A. Z., & Gates, C. M., & Roehner, R. M. (2012, June), Using Studios as a Strategy to Respond to Increasing Enrollment Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. 10.18260/1-2--22200

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2012 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015