San Antonio, Texas
June 10, 2012
June 10, 2012
June 13, 2012
2153-5965
New Classrooms, New Challenges II: Assessing Non-traditional Approaches
Chemical Engineering
22
25.1443.1 - 25.1443.22
10.18260/1-2--22200
https://peer.asee.org/22200
487
Milo Koretsky is a professor of chemical engineering at Oregon State University. He currently has research activity in areas related to thin film materials processing and engineering education. He is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. Koretsky is a six-time Intel Faculty Fellow and has won awards for his work in engineering education at the university and national levels.
Jeff Nason is an Assistant Professor of environmental engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests are in the area of physical/chemical treatment of water, with a focus on particle removal processes. He is also interested in developing effective techniques for implementing active learning activities in high-enrollment engineering courses.
Chih-hung (Alex) Chang is a professor of chemical engineering at Oregon State University. He is a SHARP Labs of America Scholar, and a recipient of Intel Faculty Fellowship, AVS Graduate Research award, National Science Foundation’s CAREER Award, and awardee of W.M. Keck Foundation. His group has studied solution-based thin film deposition processes, ink jet printing, microreaction technology, and x-ray absorption fine structure.
Using Studios as a Strategy to Respond to Increasing EnrollmentRecently chemical engineering programs in many universities have shown significant growthrelated to student interest in energy production, sustainability, and innovation chemicalprocessing. With the increasing student populations, many programs have struggled with servinglarger number of students while maintaining an effective learning environment. One approachhas been to limit enrollment and another has been to deliver the same class multiple times. Thispaper reports an alternative approach in which larger lecture classes are punctuated by smallerstudios. In the studios, students are afforded the opportunity to actively engage the contentpresented in lecture. This paper presents a comprehensive implementation of the studio approachthat comprises of the incorporation of studios in nine classes during the 2011-2012 academicyear at XXX University.We present key elements of the design and implementation of studios. They are activity based(e.g., students solving problems, explaining phenomena from in class demonstrations, answeringconceptual questions, working on virtual laboratories, etc.). The enrollment in a single studio islimited typically to about 25 students to achieve an instructional model of facilitating learningand rapid feedback.The implementation is executed by a coordinated team effort. Each class has a professor, aninstructor who serves as studio coordinator, and graduate student teaching assistants. A trainingprogram was used to prepare the graduate students for their role. In addition, there are regularmeetings between the entire team and other meetings between those in a given class. Thesemeetings contain a broad array of topics, including studio design and delivery, effectiveness andassessment, and uniform delivery, formatting, and grading. The intent is to align the design anddelivery amongst classes and between classes. In this way, we hope to create a consistentexpectation among students in a studio, lowering the cognitive demand of different formats andallowing strong student focus. Such alignment also allows more coordinated and effectivegraduate student training including introduction to teaching effectiveness in higher education.In the paper, we will provide description, analysis, and student perception of the first quarter ofthe widespread studio implementation in three classes: material balances, thermodynamics andfluid mechanics. We will also comment on the administrative support and department cultureneeded for this type of curricular innovation.This work could either fit in a regular session or, with the appropriate other papers, in a"discussion" session.
Koretsky, M., & Williamson, K. J., & Nason, J. A., & Jovanovic, G., & Chang, C., & Higgins, A. Z., & Gates, C. M., & Roehner, R. M. (2012, June), Using Studios as a Strategy to Respond to Increasing Enrollment Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. 10.18260/1-2--22200
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2012 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015