What If They Choose: Surfacing Insights Associated with a Pedagogy for Doctoral Education

Jennifer A. Turns

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Baltimore , Maryland
Publication Date: June 25, 2023
Start Date: June 25, 2023
End Date: June 28, 2023
Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 9: Lessons Learned from Engineering Graduate Programs
Tagged Division: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)
Page Count: 13
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--44615
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/44615
Download Count: 239

Paper Authors

biography

Jennifer A. Turns University of Washington

visit author page

Dr. Jennifer Turns is a full professor in the Human Centered Design & Engineering Department in the College of Engineering at the University of Washington. Engineering education is her primary area of scholarship, and has been throughout her career. In her work, she currently focuses on the role of reflection in engineering student learning and the relationship of research and practice in engineering education. In recent years, she has been the co-director of the Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE, funded by the Helmsley Charitable Trust), a member of the governing board for the International Research in Engineering Education Network, and an Associate Editor for the Journal of Engineering Education. Dr. Turns has published over 175 journal and conference papers on topics related to engineering education.

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

In their volume on pedagogy in doctoral programs, Lee and Danby (2012) argue that doctoral education is “ripe for reshaping” and that the “pedagogical practices in higher education remain extraordinarily and even shockingly undocumented.” One approach represented in their volume is to identify and disrupt an assumption embedded in a traditional form of pedagogy and then construct pedagogy around a new perspective. For example, a traditional part of doctoral experience is classes where students read a selection of papers curated by an educator, often as a way for students to practice “reading like a scholar.” In order for such a pedagogy to be sustained, the selection of papers needs to be constantly or at least periodically updated. Over time, this work of curating papers can contribute to a lack of sustainability of the pedagogy.

With this in mind, several years ago, one such course set off on a different trajectory, exploring how to build a doctoral pedagogy around students choosing the papers. With the notion of documentation in mind, our current work asks: What loci of refinement have emerged over a multi-year effort to create an entire pedagogical approach that is anchored by having students read what they want, and what wisdom is associated with each locus of refinement? The term locus of refinement is borrowed from DiSessa and Cobb’s work on design-based research in education and the recognition that knowledge can be found in acts of refinement.

This work is situated in a 10 year period of teaching first year doctoral students in a single discipline. To address the research questions, the work is proceeding in three phases: aggregation of data, identification of loci of refinement, and thick descriptions related to each locus of refinement. In the preparation phase, traces of the teaching over time have been assembled. In the identification phase, an expansive set of over time refinements has been generated and then organized into a parsimonious set of loci of refinements. In the describe phase, an iterative constant comparison approach is being adopted. The overall product of this effort is a finalized set of loci of refinements and discussion for each locus of refinement about possible choices and insights revealed about the choices, such as trade offs and design tensions.

The work in progress will focus of describing the loci of refinements and talking about what has been revealed in relation to the cornerstone issue of choosing readings To foreshadow: the following loci of refinement have current been identified: choosing readings, analyses of readings and the curation of these analyses, technical infrastructure, together time, reflection opportunities, transfer opportunities, and individual student engagement. Also, exploration of the refinements related to choosing of readings has surfaced a tension between liberating constraints and inclusion.

DiSessa, A. A., & Cobb, P. (2004). Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 77-103. Lee, A., & Danby, S. (2012). Reshaping doctoral education. International approaches and pedagogies. Routledge: New York.

Citation
Format

Turns, J. A. (2023, June), What If They Choose: Surfacing Insights Associated with a Pedagogy for Doctoral Education Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--44615

TY - CPAPER
AB - In their volume on pedagogy in doctoral programs, Lee and Danby (2012) argue that doctoral education is “ripe for reshaping” and that the “pedagogical practices in higher education remain extraordinarily and even shockingly undocumented.” One approach represented in their volume is to identify and disrupt an assumption embedded in a traditional form of pedagogy and then construct pedagogy around a new perspective. For example, a traditional part of doctoral experience is classes where students read a selection of papers curated by an educator, often as a way for students to practice “reading like a scholar.” In order for such a pedagogy to be sustained, the selection of papers needs to be constantly or at least periodically updated. Over time, this work of curating papers can contribute to a lack of sustainability of the pedagogy.

With this in mind, several years ago, one such course set off on a different trajectory, exploring how to build a doctoral pedagogy around students choosing the papers. With the notion of documentation in mind, our current work asks: What loci of refinement have emerged over a multi-year effort to create an entire pedagogical approach that is anchored by having students read what they want, and what wisdom is associated with each locus of refinement? The term locus of refinement is borrowed from DiSessa and Cobb’s work on design-based research in education and the recognition that knowledge can be found in acts of refinement.

This work is situated in a 10 year period of teaching first year doctoral students in a single discipline. To address the research questions, the work is proceeding in three phases: aggregation of data, identification of loci of refinement, and thick descriptions related to each locus of refinement. In the preparation phase, traces of the teaching over time have been assembled. In the identification phase, an expansive set of over time refinements has been generated and then organized into a parsimonious set of loci of refinements. In the describe phase, an iterative constant comparison approach is being adopted. The overall product of this effort is a finalized set of loci of refinements and discussion for each locus of refinement about possible choices and insights revealed about the choices, such as trade offs and design tensions.

The work in progress will focus of describing the loci of refinements and talking about what has been revealed in relation to the cornerstone issue of choosing readings To foreshadow: the following loci of refinement have current been identified: choosing readings, analyses of readings and the curation of these analyses, technical infrastructure, together time, reflection opportunities, transfer opportunities, and individual student engagement. Also, exploration of the refinements related to choosing of readings has surfaced a tension between liberating constraints and inclusion.

DiSessa, A. A., &amp;amp; Cobb, P. (2004). Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 77-103.
Lee, A., &amp;amp; Danby, S. (2012). Reshaping doctoral education. International approaches and pedagogies. Routledge: New York.
AU - Jennifer A. Turns
CY - Baltimore , Maryland
DA - 2023/06/25
PB - ASEE Conferences
TI - What If They Choose: Surfacing Insights Associated with a Pedagogy for Doctoral Education
UR - https://peer.asee.org/44615
DO - 10.18260/1-2--44615
ER -