Montreal, Canada
June 16, 2002
June 16, 2002
June 19, 2002
2153-5965
16
7.1314.1 - 7.1314.16
10.18260/1-2--10952
https://peer.asee.org/10952
435
Main Menu
Document 2002-333
What’s It Like for the Women? Acceptance, Inclusion, and Equity in Predominantly Male Technical Programs
Barbara M. I. Goldberg, Ph.D., Liz O’Shaughnessy, Ph.D. DeVry College of Technology, NJ/DeVry Institute, Long Beach, CA
Abstract
Efforts continue at our nation’s colleges to recruit and retain an increasingly diverse student population. While overall enrollment is now more than 50% female, enrollment of women in electronics and other technical programs is still very small. What is it like for the female students who find themselves enrolled in programs where both the student body and faculty are predominantly male? This paper will present recent quantitative and qualitative research on female student perceptions of acceptance, inclusion, and equity at their institutions. The findings that will be shared reveal both positive factors and areas of ongoing challenge for both the women and their institutions. The reported perceptions are clearly useful to both faculty and administration as they endeavor to meet the needs of this segment of the student body.
In an effort to understand what their female students experience, surveys and focus groups were conducted in 1999, 2000, and 2001 at the North Brunswick New Jersey and Long Beach California campuses of DeVry Institute of Technology. The overall female enrollment at the Institutes is now approaching 25%. This represents an increase of approximately 6% in the past few years. Within the electronics program, however, the number is less than 10%. Women frequently find themselves enrolled in classes where there are 3 or fewer other women in a group of approximately 40 students. Women enrolling in these programs enter with GPAs and entrance exam scores equivalent to their male peers. The impetus for the research was whether or not they perceived that they were treated as equals once they were enrolled. Did they find themselves accepted by their male counterparts? Did they perceive that faculty members had the same expectations of success for them? Socially, did they feel comfortable? Did they perceive that they were subject to gender discrimination or sexual harassment? Did they have educational needs that were at variance with those of the male students? Could information be obtained that could be used for the basis of improvement of services?
The initial surveying was done using the Student Satisfaction Inventory (SSI) with several campus items tailored to capture gender equity data. The sample included a carefully stratified representative sample of approximately 50% of enrolled students. Focus groups were conducted with female students from an array of technical majors and whose length of enrollment varied from first to final year. A follow-up gender survey sampled the perceptions and experiences of successful senior level students. The information gained through these processes revealed areas in which to fruitfully fine-tune delivery of services and design gender specific support programs.
“Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”
Main Menu
Oshaughnessy, L., & Goldberg, B. (2002, June), What's It Like For The Women? Acceptance, Inclusion, And Equity In Predominately Male Technical Programs Paper presented at 2002 Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada. 10.18260/1-2--10952
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2002 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015